Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Hi Netters, May I add a few brief words to the automation discussion: 1) Time time spent or not spent automating (at least after the first set-up time) will be entirely determined by the degree of anal retentiveness of the media specialist. A fuss budget will be able to kill tons of time, but the less particular will use *much* less time than keeping up on circulation and updating a catalog manually. At least I did with my Winnebago. HOWEVER... 2) More important than the time saved by the media specialist should be the time saved by the searcher. Children are more successful in less time with an electronic catalog. Less time searching = more time evaluating, processing, using what they find. Teachers can quickly create bibliographies and will be more likely to look for and use media center resources, esp if the catalog can be searched from a networked computer in their classroom. 3) The collection will get better use. A search on Egypt will yield not just geography and history books, but also books about alphabets, cooking, architecture, etc because of term searches in the notes field. 4) Automate because your students need whole life skills like boolean search strategies which will be transfered to other electonic resources like magazine and newspaper indexes (and public and university catalogs). 5) Automate so that one day you can share your resources with other library patrons via interlibrary loan. Huge percentages of our collections are unique in the library world. 6) Automate so some of us don't have to silently sing the ABC song when pawing through the card drawers. Good luck in getting your funding... Doug Doug Johnson, District Media Supervisor | Never teach a pig to sing. It will Mankato Public Schools, ISD77, | frustrate you and annoy the pig. Box 8741, Mankato MN 56001-8741 | -Old Iowa saying 507-387-7698 palsdaj@vax1.mankato.msus.edu