Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
You touch on a key gripe of mine--why do we buy into the "bigger, faster, glitzier, 'mine is faster than yours'" way of thinking? Why not put all the development time and $$$ into a solid, well-researched program that can have its data easily upgraded without having to reinvent the program each time. I am noticing a disturbing trend among my students. Some (granted a small number, but mostly lower-achieving students, the ones who really need to be information literate) giving up on electronic databases because (to quote one who was honest and direct to a fault) "Every time I come in, the directions are different. Who need this s**t?!" I find myself agreeing with this attitude more and more. Is our purpose to teach students how to find information and make use of it, or to teach a seemingly endless series of new and different commands to achieve what was achieved before? I'm not against change for the better, but increasingly what I see is change for change's sake in the pursuit of market share. Forget the bells and whistles--give us (and students) solid, well-designed, functional programs and stick with them for a while! Regards, Mark