Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Hi, folks . . . The issue is "work made for hire." For information, see http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ9.html . The quoted policy is consistent with copyright law. Quoting in part from the Copyright Office circular: > >Introduction > > > >Under the 1976 Copyright Act as amended (title 17 of the United States >Code), a work is protected by copyright from the time it is created in a >fixed form. In other words, when a work is written down or otherwise set >into tangible form, the copyright immediately becomes the property of the >author who created it. Only the author or those deriving their rights from >the author can rightfully claim copyright. > >Although the general rule is that the person who creates a work is the >author of that work, there is an exception to that" principle: the >copyright law defines a category of works called "works made for hire." If >a work is "made for hire," the employer, and not the employee, is >considered the author. The employer may be a firm, an organization, or an >individual. > >To understand the complex concept of a work made for hire, it is necessary >to refer not only to the statutory definition but also to its >interpretation in cases decided by courts. > > > > >Statutory Definition > > > >Section 101 of the copyright law defines a "work made for hire" as: > >(1) a work prepared by an employee within the scope of his or her >employment; . . . To seek to change the policy Ms. Speranza cited would be to seek to have the district adopt a policy that is not in accordance with copyright law and standard practice. I responded directly to Ms. Speranza, but this point may be of general enough interest to be worth posting to the list. >Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:47:06 -0500 >From: Susan Speranza <castleriggpekes@GMAIL.COM> >Subject: QUESTION: Policies on Teachers'/Librarians' Intellectual Property > > Hello All: >Our school board, who we have been constantly at odds with for many years, >is reviewing our policies and procedures. One of the things they insist on >is owning works created by employees (like lesson plans, or books teachers >may be writing?). Anyway, here is how they phrase it (below). > >What I'd like to know is what do your policies say about this matter (if >anything)? It is my opinion that we as a staff should fight this. Regards, Ken ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ken Umbach Columnist, Knowledge Quest Policy Analyst, California Research Bureau, California State Library Writer, editor, researcher, consultant, www.umbachconsulting.com ken@umbachconsulting.com 916-733-2159 -- voice mail --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------