Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Hi all, I have been rethinking about technology infrastructure. All that I have read about 1:1 laptops has convinced me that these programs are a massive waste of financial resources. I do not think we are anywhere near the point where all of the teachers in any given school are ready to make really effective use of computers. AND there are a whole heck of a lot of other learning activities where computers are not necessary or appropriate. Like PE, Band, Choir, etc. So even if fully implemented instructionally, for over half of the day these expensive computers are serving as very heavy backpack weights - or worse - are being used for "Internet recess" which is when misuse occurs. AND on top of this are all of the concerns related to technical support, breakage, etc. AND schools are broke. Also it is time to admit it - all bets are off when it comes to reliance in filtering. I am now hearing reports of elementary students (admittedly 5th graders) who have figured out how to bypass the filter. So the only folks in your schools who are actually blocked from accessing anything are the adult staff. No amount of "wishing it were not so" - or false promises from the filtering vendors will change this basic fact. One of the major downsides of the reliance on filtering has been the misperception that the technical services department can - and is responsible for - preventing student misuse. So teachers have felt free to take their little darlings to the lab to let them "explore the Internet" or give them free time online as a " reward" - without engaging in sufficient supervision. So I have been thinking about what we really do need. And let me be clear - this is my "thinking" which means I would really enjoy dialogue and am quite open to someone telling me this is a dumb idea or can't be done. ;-) Focus on providing appropriate computing devices (computers, netbooks, etc.) where necessary to meet *instructional needs.* All teachers need whiteboards. Computers readily available for all language arts, science, and social studies classes. Could be computers on wheels. Computer labs for vocational classes - computer science, graphic arts, newspaper, and the like. Assistive and remedial uses - provide differentiated instruction for students who are struggling. Open labs in library or vocational class labs when not in use - for students to do work outside of class. Labs should be open for a period of time after school for use by students without home computers. Filters still have some usefulness in preventing accidental access and in defining probably boundaries for what is potentially not acceptable. But we need 2 categories of blocking: Potentially harmful to minors - obscenity, adult sex, gross, hate. Can only be overridden with administrator approval. (eg a high school teacher may need to teach about online hate.) Basically the CIPA requirements and a few more. Management restrictions - material that is generally not educational. All teachers should have the authority to override these blocks for clearly defined instructional use - have clear standards, maybe a reporting process ("overrode the filter on 12/5 to show students some YouTube videos related to class discussion on ...) So we need to demand from filtering companies 2 override levels. Shift from reliance on blocking to more effective watching. Remote access monitoring in all schools, possibly intelligent content analysis monitoring. Teachers required to supervise - good technique is random request to see history file - 5 - 8 times per class period. Also, no just sending students to library for "Internet recess." System to allow teachers, especially in elementary schools, to "white list" certain sites so these are the only sites that can be accessed (could be in stages - these sites for the lesson and these sites for "reward or extra credit). EduPlatform is a tool that does this - can be used to create Internet resource-based lessons that can be easily shared. Web 2.0 environment accessible from any computer/device (what are the security concerns about this?) that has: Separate section for teachers for ongoing professional dialogue/development, mentoring, sharing of information, and sharing of lesson plans. This needs to be set up ASAP. Class webpages (with assignments, links to resources, etc.), blogs, wikis. These should be private to the class or school - but there also should be a way to showcase student work on a more open district site and to set up collaborative interactions with students from other schools - or bring in other experts. These need to be REALLY easy for teachers to set up. Student password protected "work portfolio." (The argument for 1:1 laptops is that students always have their work with them. If districts can set up online work portfolios, then students would be easily able to access their work from any computer or device.) From this portfolio, students should be able to send documents to teachers, or post to the class blog or wiki. So these are my thoughts for a new paradigm. What am I not thinking through clearly? What are the barriers that I have not considered? What else is needed? What is wrong with this? Or what is right? For the record, my father was an inventor of food products (potato flakes for instant mashed potatoes, among other things) - so my mode of operation is to try something or to set something out and then try to figure out what is not right and what needs to be fixed. All best, Nancy -- Nancy Willard, M.S., J.D. Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use http://csriu.org http://cyberbully.org http://cyber-safe-kids.com http://csriu.wordpress.com nwillard@csriu.org Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Aggression, Threats, and Distress (Research Press) Cyber-Safe Kids, Cyber-Savvy Teens: Helping Young People Learn to Use the Internet Safely and Responsibly (Jossey-Bass) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, you send a message to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * LM_NET Help & Information: http://lmnet.wordpress.com/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/join.html * LM_NET Supporters: http://lmnet.wordpress.com/category/links/el-announce/ --------------------------------------------------------------------