Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
When I read the original posting asking for reasons to automate, I felt sure that the list would be flooded with hundreds of reasons. When I instead noticed that the contributions lamented the automation process, I felt that I had to jump in with the positive side of automation. My media center added Circulation and Catalog Plus 5 and 6 years ago respectively. My secretary and I (with the aid of anyone in grabbing distance) barcoded all books and made sure each shelf list card had an LC # as we added the barcode number strip to it. We weeded like crazy during the process using the idea that if the item wasn't worth at least $2.00 to the collection, we tossed it. Our collection of books went from 17,000 to 11,000. We have never missed the 6000 that we discarded. Each night I would take home the 100 or so shelf list cards that we had found time to barcode during the day ( about an hour total) and would type in a brief record for them on the computer that I took home. This took about an hour a day. I know that this was not work time, but when I was a classroom teacher, an hour a day of outside work was an easy homework day. I usually spent 2 or more hours. Within several months our shelflist was ready to send to Follett for retrospective conversion. We began using the circulation part of the program while we waited our records to come back. These things happened immediately: 1. The 3 hours a week my secretary normally spent preparing overdue notices were reduced to 10 minutes. 2. The 1 hour a day we spent checking in books was reduced to 5 minutes. 3. The 1 hour a day we spent locating the cards for books students wanted to reserve and tagging them was reduced to 5 minutes. 4. We changed our check out procedure to total self service. WE no longer had to search our hit list to see if the student was on the overdue list. The computer kep track of this for us. Students simply scanned their card (provided free by our school picture company), scanned their books, then scanned a barcode on the desk (a non-existant patron number with no check out priviledges) to take their name off of the screen. This saved huge amounts of time, as neither of us were ever tied to the circulation desk again. Within 6 months of the beginning of the project, we realized that we had much more time to spend helping our students and teachers. That helping time was more productive, as well. We were no longer helping them check out a book, but were helping them find and use information. When our catalog disks arrived and were loaded into our computer the time saving really began. The hundreds of hours we spent each year maintaining our card catalog were reduced to minutes. We have trained two secretaries at the central office to create records for AV items, the main things we have to hand catalog, and they send the records to us on a batch disk. We only have to dump them in and add a barcode number. There has been some concern about authority on the list. This is still a problem as it always was with cards. However, the keyword search function makes the problem relatively unimportant for a small school library. Students can learn about truncation and combining terms and almost always succeed in finding what they want. This was NEVER true with our card catalog. I could go on forever about the advantages of automation but will stop. Let me simply state, once you complete the process you will know that all of the headaches were worth it! -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- paula@freenet.fsu.edu Paula Galland - St. Simons Island, GA - Glynn County School System ---------------------------------------------------------------------