Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I have always told my students that the system is not to protect against theft--systems are useless against that. Any student who wishes could work out 5 ways of circumventing your system within a day. Instead it is a reminder to those students who forget that they have not signed out a book. Losses are cut substantially after the system is installed. The system is much more an absent mindedness prevention system than a theft prevention system. Looking at it like that you do not have to have philosophical reservations about using a first rate tool. On Sat, 26 Feb 1994, Koleta B Tilson wrote: > Instructions: > If you do not know an answer to Question 1, please respond to > Question 2. If you are not harboring a philosophical mind-set, > could you offer a simple _yes_ or _no_ to Question 3? > > Q 1. I would like to review an independent study of the use of > library security/detection systems in schools. Does anyone know > of a recent/available research report? > Q 2. Do you consider the use of these surveillance devices in > schools as treating the symptom rather than the illness? > Q 3. If I gamble losing the library holdings against a chance of > developing honesty, integrity, and the spirit of community in the > children and lose, should I turn in my key after locking the door? > ----------------------------------------------- > Koleta B. Tilson, Librarian "tempora mutantur > Sullivan Central High School nos et mutamurm in illis" > Blountville, TN 37617 <times change and we change > kbtilson@sacam.oren.ortn.edu with them>-John Owen, d1622