Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Fellow LM_NETTER'S, As part of a technology planning team, I have been exploring what's out the re in terms of policies related to legal and ethical use of technology. I now have a number of examples of what other schools have done, as well as some articles (including the SLJ article that highlights consideration of freedom of speech issues). Whether an AUP can prevent illegal or unethical activity isn't so much the issue for us as informing/educating our community and making a statement consistent with others we make about behavioral expectations. Aside from formulating a statement that matches our school culture, we're interested in knowing whether there's a "down" side to a policy statement. One member of our group thinks she's seen mention of a school's liability for illegal activity being greater for having had a policy. Expedience isn't our primary impetus, but we'd like to know about pitfalls. We are an independent school of 320 students, ages 3-14. Thanks for any input. Kathy Foulke Librarian The Gordon School East Providence, RI