Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I have to disagree with Duncan, but first let me compliment him on a complex system of Internet supervision. We have not begun to attempt that much control. Once our students and their parents have signed the AUP, the students are pretty free to "surf" wherever. We do not have e-mail because our state does not have a computer big enough to hold the volume of mail which would be generated by all the students, and our school does not have one either. We felt that it was more important for the students to be able to search for information than for them to correspond, although that is admittedly a tough call. However, in three months of Internet use we have already had a teacher stumble upon a photo of the area between a woman's legs with a cigarette held to it and a student gasp in horrow when he connected with a photo of two naked women fondling each other. My aide was working with the student at the time and swore that there was no indication that the connection would result in that. We have also had students spending lots of time discussing the size of girlfriends boobs, exchanging My Mother is so Ugly that....jokes, and generally not using this limited and valuable technology for educational (well, school-oriented) activities. Of course that violates their AUP, but it is still an issue for discussion. Regardless, my comment was not that I was worried about filth. I said that there are many parents in my district who are worried about it. Teachers can not,therefore, require Internet use. Access to information is not the issue here. Parental permission is. Carole H. Carpenter chcrpntr@strauss.udel.edu