Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
On Sat, 3 Feb 1996, Mark Williams wrote: > Louise: > > Interesting... I hadn''t actually given this a lot of thought until I read > your reply to another message. I, too, was taught that genre applied to the > kind of material -- play, short story, novel, poetry. But since some novel > (and other) forms do have rather specific conventions (I'm thinking of > romance novels, epic fantasy, historical fiction, roman a clef, etc., why not > broaden the use of genre to include those? It would make a description much > more precise I think. Instead of 'novel' including everything from V.C. > Andrews to Mark Twain to J.R.R. Tolkein to Donald Westlake, specific terms > like 'historical novel' , 'epic fantasy', 'trash fiction' (just kidding - I > think) would be more helpful to patrons. > > What do you think? > > Mark Williams > Librarian > Colton High School > Dear Mark, The American Library Association materials caution about labeling, e.g. "Controversial Materials," as a form of censorship. I don't think broader genre labeling is a problem. Edna Boardman, Minot High School, Magic City Campus, Minot, ND