Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Dear Dick: Excuse me, Dick, but I couldn't resist responding publicly to some of the misinformation you inadvertently included in your recent multi-part message regarding AUPs in Indiana. You stated, for instance, that "the state DOE has mandated that all schools should have an AUP Statement. However, it has given schools the complete freedom to do it in whatever way they want!" In fact, the state mandate for AUPs in Indiana public schools originated in the Governor's office--it was simply announced by the IDOE--and with that mandate came two pages of requirements and recommendations <http://doe.state.in.us/LearningResources/aup123> on how they should be framed. Later you state that some schools or districts "have developed AUP Statement simply by having the superintendent and the Tech Cord. (some schools do not have a tech. cord. and it is just the superintendent) write up a statement for the purpose of getting a particular grant." In fact, there is currently only one grant program in Indiana which specifically requires districts to have an AUP in place--the Internet connectivity grants <http://doe.state.in.us/reed/happenings/log.html> available through Intelenet--and the requirements of that program include a board approved policy, not one written "in the back of [a] smoke filled room" and "not even...sent to the school board" as your message states. Still later you express alarm that some schools or districts will "have their policy statement hidden and only bring it out to hold teachers responsible" and "will hide their Policy statement for the expressed purpose of...putting the blame on the teacher". In fact, one of the specific state requirements for district AUPs in Indiana is that they be "available for review by all parents, guardians, staff and members of the community." Further, all district AUPs submitted for compliance with the requirements for eligibility for the Intelenet grants mentioned above are maintained on file and are available for public review by the IDOE Office of Learning Resources. Dick, I truly feel that there are a number of very legitimate intellectual freedom related concerns inherent in the student use of school provided Internet access and the development of district AUPs; however, consideration and discussion of those concerns should be based on fact and not emotion. This is obviously an issue about which you care passionately. If you would like the IDOE Office of Learning Resources to provide you with any pertinent information, please feel free to contact me. Our toll-free number in Indiana is 800/527-4930. John W. Shearin jshearin@doe.state.in.us Office of Learning Resources http://doe.state.in.us/LearningResources Indiana Dept. of Education http://ideanet.doe.state.in.us