Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
DEAR LM_NET COLLEAGUES, Important news from our friend, Bob Carlitz, founder of the superb listserv for educators, KIDSPHERE, via a friend of school libraries, Laurie Maak. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 03:04:54 -0400 From: Bob Carlitz <bob@hamlet.phyast.pitt.edu> To: lmaak@netcom.com Subject: One Billion Dollars for School Networking One Billion Dollars for School Networking Recent federal legislation now in the implementation stage offers the promise of as much as a one billion dollar annual subsidy for school networking efforts in the United States. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 revises telecommunications law that has been on the books for over 60 years and extends the concept of "universal service" to include explicit subsidies for schools, libraries and rural health care providers. The magnitude of these subsidies and the mechanisms by which they will be administered is the subject of a "rule making" process now under way at the Federal Communications Commission. This is a process in which public participation is possible, if not traditional. By using the Internet to mobilize public participation in the FCC's rule making process, it may be possible to assure that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 will meet the promise of helping to bring Internet access to every school classroom and every public library in the country. So far participation in the FCC's rule making process on Universal Service appears to have been dominated by the telecommunications industry and by Washington-based nonprofits. Although the Telecommunications Act specifically targets schools for major new subsidies, only 2 school districts out of 16,000 and only 3 state departments of education have filed comments with the FCC on the subject of Universal Service. The stakes in this effort are huge. The present Universal Service fund involves $700 million a year, and it is not implausible that the new fund for schools, libraries and rural health care providers will be even larger. The tone of comments submitted to the FCC tends to support this interpretation. The exact size of the subsidy and the mechanism of its distribution depend upon public input to the FCC. Time is short if you would like to participate in the present phase of the rule making process. Indeed, you'll probably have to act in the next day or two if you want to make a difference. To make it possible to deal with these complex issues in the short timeframe that is available, a Pittsburgh-based nonprofit known has Information Renaissance is creating an online site which contains material relevant to the FCC's current procedures on Universal Service. The site at http://www.ckp.edu/info-ren/fcc/telecom.html contains the following information: 1- FCC rules and deadlines for the filing of "reply comments," which are due with a current deadline of May 7. 2- Information Renaissance's request to extend this deadline by one week so as to allow more widespread public participation. 3- The text of comments that were submitted in the previous round of public input. 4- Pointers to other online resources, particularly those at the FCC and the Benton Foundation, which are likely to be relevant to people wishing to submit reply comments. If you begin to study these materials, you may find yourself online for the better part of the upcoming weekend. But, considering that your efforts could well release funds on the order of $30 per student per year (or a total of one billion dollars annually) for the support of school networking, this may prove to be time well spent. I hope you will take a look at the online materials relating to the Universal Service discussion and will choose to submit reply comments in time for the FCC's May 7 deadline. Information Renaissance will send out an announcement if there is a positive response to its request to extend this deadline. Thanks, Bob Carlitz Executive Director Information Renaissance