Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
LM_Netters, Early last week I asked if you considered book checkout to be a "right" or a "privilege" and if you felt that right should ever be denied--for any reason. I was quite pleasantly surprised to receive more than 50 responses. Your answers varied quite a lot, but I will try to summarize to provide a little feedback. Most people (more than 45) considered book checkout to be a privilege, but a privilege with responsibilities. Of those remaining, some felt it was both, one felt it was a right that becomes a privilege that may be lost. One felt that it is most definitely a right--a vital part of educating children, never to be viewed as a privilege. As far as denying book checkout, some people addressed only the issue of overdue books as a reason, others spoke to the question of unruly behavior and some discussed both reasons. Most (44) of you who responded felt that checkout should be denied if a student has outstanding books. As soon as the outstanding books are returned, the student should be free to borrow more. Many suggested that they let a student select a book to be held at the circulation desk until outstanding books are returned. Only 4 suggested that they don't deny checkout, regardless of overdues. Where unruly behavior is concerned, opinions were about 50/50. Some felt that poor behavior may suggest a lack of respect for others or the possibility that library materials may not be treated carefully and, therefore, withhold the opportunity to checkout a book. Most suggest that if a student is misbehaving checkout of materials is postponed--that is, the student may return at a time without the class to borrow a book. Others suggest that behavior and book checkout are two separate issues. Therefore, poor behavior should not be tied to borrowing privileges. One suggested employing bibliotherapy to correct unruly behavior. All in all, I was impressed with the response and answers. You certainly provided me with some "food for thought." Thanks to all. Kathy Hutton