Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 11:05:59 -0700 There is no question that cooperative program planning and teaching is time-consuming, emotionally demanding and taxing professionally, but then so is working with kids, especially when 32 ask you the same question over and over again. There is also no question, however, that teacher-librarians only impact student achievement through collaboration with teachers. That doesn't leave much doubt about priorities and "which ditch is worth dying in". Good luck!--Ken Haycock From: Ken Haycock <haycock@UNIXG.UBC.CA> Subject: Re: GEN: Information skills curriculum When I was responsible for curriculum and staff development in a large school district [110 schools] we religiously "pumped out" continua of skills/processes/strategies and scope and sequences of content/skills. When we paused long enough to review the research and looked around and consulted with clients, we learned that we were producing little more than colorful and expensive wall paper for faculty lounges and classrooms. So we turned to applying the research and started to train school staffs to develop their own, using the district charts as a starting point if they wished. State/district produced lists do not engender ownership and do not take account of different communities and programs. There is little more professional than discussing and negotiating curricular and instructional issues in schools if the principal and staff have the skills to handle conflict productively.--Ken Haycock