Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Dear LM Neters, Here is the results when I asked you all for feedback on Follett, Winnebago and Casper as automation programs. Out of 29 responses: 11 using and loving Follett, 18 using and loving Winnebago and zero comments on Casper. People said that they were not familiar with Casper. Follett comments : Pleased with product and service, upgrades, used for 7 yrs. Liked it, used 6 years. Great relationship with them. Used Winne. and Follett, could be happy with either, but Follett wins if compare two catalogs. Follett support staff great. Used for 8 yrs, purchased books from them,no changes needed to cataloging. 6 yrs used, great support and upgrading. Does not provide serials capability or authority control and won't export AV records with proper MARC codes. 12 yrs. used, developed by librarians, sensitive to needs of school librarians. Easy to use. Love DOS version but hate MAC version. Winnebago: Hands down over Follett. Only used Winne love it, easy. Used 4 yrs, MAC, grades 1-5,easy to use. Love their support,call right back. Liked format and support. Tech line is excellent,works well on Novell. Used 6 yrs, customer support great. Easy for students and faculty to use. Used 10 yrs, great support for non-tech person. Used 12 yrs, students, teachers and Media specialists satisfied with it. Simple clear screen. Has user group newsletter. Constantly updating system. Casper : people just said not familiar with.. Other comments: "Library Technology Reports" is a publication that is published every 2 years and it evaluates major automation systems. Did you look at Mandarin? Check the LM Net archives. (And I had several requests for a hit) Thank you all for your responses..and I apologize for not getting this information out sooner! :( Since school has started....well, I don't need to tell all of you what it is like!! :) Have a great weekend, Bunkie Wilson Readfield, ME bunkiew@aol.com