Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
On Sun, 29 Sep 1996, Sherry Wilk wrote: > The ATT world net software referred to contains a browser that is ions faster > than that provided with AOL...when it works!! I am using it on a PC (486 > with a 28.8 modem and 8 megs RAM). I tried it so I could get rid of my AOL, > and as I said, its super when it works, but due to it being unreliable, I am > still using AOL for LM_net mail and other assorted goodies. I am also > thinking about switching all togethter to a local provider called > Netrunner... Sherry and Group, I find this discussion very interesting. When we dropped AOL and our last bill was $130 (when it had *averaged* $30 per month previously), I was glad that we chose to go with AT&T (our long distance provider). We have found AT&T Worldnet to be as reliable or more so than AOL and *much* faster and easier to use. Could it be that "realiability" depends on the population using particular lines? We also use the free Juno e-mail. We seldom have problems with it, but those from more populated regions say they have some problems with getting online and with slowness of downloading. Of course, since all of Juno is automatic -- automatically logs on, downloads, logs off -- that's not much of a problem. You just tell it to do its thing and then go do something else. When you come back, it's downloaded and you respond off-line. I just remembered that I have a hit about online costs. I'll get that ready to post today. Thanks for the reminder! Betty .----. Betty Hamilton, LRS | | 701 Cub Drive bhamilt@tenet.edu ____|* ~~~~~~. Brownfield TX 79316 Brownfield High School \ | (806) 637-4523 \_/\ . / \ { \ } ~