Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
We recently had a ninth grade student accused of plagiarism after uncited material was found to have come from a source which was not even listed in the Works Cited. This incident has raised a question for us. How do we distinguish plagiarism from simply sloppy research. For example, in the case above, if the source had been listed in the Works Cited, it would appear that the student had, without intent to deceive, missed a parenthetical citation. Some of us feel that would merely be sloppy research, particularly in the case of a ninth grade student. While there should still be a penalty for sloppy research, the 0 on the paper which is the penalty for plagiarism seems rather severe. Does any school have a code which spells out exactly where sloppy research ends and plagiarism begins? We are especially interested in one which sets increasing standards as the student progresses through to the 12 th grade. In addition, any specific definition of plagiarism that would be helpful in making this distinction would be appreciated. Please direct all responses to me at the address below. TIA, ******************************************************************* Kelley S. Wilson "The naked intellect is an extraordinarily inaccurate (kewilson@mailbox.syr.edu) instrument." -- Madeleine L'Engle *******************************************************************