Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Dear LM_NETTERS, we have recently implemented Accelerated Reader at my K-5 school. I have a personal hangup with giving prizes to children in order to encourage them to read. Whatever happened to reading for reading sake? Should we teach children to expect extrinsic rewards for something, such as reading, that has intrinsic value? I actually had a student the other day who was visibly upset because she read a book and it wasn't on the disk! What had she done other than read a book--what was wrong with that? I think she missed the point. I'm not in to offering challenges to see which class can read the most books and get the most answers correct. I think that it encourages unhealthy competition. And I certainly don't want to promise to get on top of the school building if the children read a certain number of books, as my principal suggested! My daughter is a graduate student and is planning to do a proposal on this very subject. Maybe following up on high school students who were involved in Accelerated Reader(or similar programs) in elementary and middle school to find out if those students are now avid readers. Or, when the prizes stopped coming, did they lose interest in reading? I wonder if any of you have done or are aware of any research on this topic. I'm sure that the producers of the programs can produce plenty of evidence in favor of them, but she is interested in information from a more neutral source. She would appreciate any feedback on the subject that might help her in developing her topic. TIA Please reply to me at: naellis@eastnet.educ.ecu.edu Nancy Ellis Library Media Specialist Johnson Elementary School Rocky Mount, NC