Re: Gen: Privacy Drawback...

[Kathryn Frech <lib@STNY.LRUN.COM>]

Earl J. Moniz  (earlj@moniz.org) wrote:

>  An example of one of the major drawbacks for all this
> privacy stuff on our own listserv is that I wanted to ask
> this person his or her definition of SDI without having to
> respond to the entire listserv and wasting the time and
> space of those who know what it is ... and I do not mean
> to imply that the person who wrote this response is in any
> way at fault for the current situation.


I don't understand the problem - isn't that exactly why we're
all asked to include our email addresses with our sigs,to make
sure individual correspondence _is possible? If the poster
didn't include an email address, as you and I did, that's really
a singular problem, not a problem with the system as a whole.

----------------------------------

Kathryn Frech, Librarian
Seton Catholic Central H.S.
Binghamton, NY  13905
(lib@stny.lrun.com)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=
To quit LM_NET (or set NOMAIL or DIGEST), Send an email message to
    listserv@listserv.syr.edu    In the message write EITHER:
 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST
  * NOTE: Please allow time for confirmation from Listserv.
For LM_NET Help & Archives see:  http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=