Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
As a current English teacher working on LMS certification, I have a few ideas here. You may choose to ignore them because they come from someone on the other side of the fence. First of all, I'd bet good money that your teachers are very aware of the benefits of reading a book more than once. You don't need to convince them of that. What they are also aware of, however, is that many students and parents do not understand that a book can be interesting the second time around. Like anyone who teaches classroom novels (which is not a new instructional technique) they have dealt with complaints from parents and students and want to avoid them. The problem is not that they don't understand but that they are the ones who will have to deal with the people who don't understand. From your description, it sounds like you may have made a mistake when you offered to help them expand their reading lists. This would suggest to me that you are not aware of the work that went into creating an articulated list like this one and that you may not respect the knowledge of your colleagues. Granted, you have ample reason *not* to respect their knowledge when they ask you to do something so stupid as removing classics from your collection. But I think you should try hard to demonstrate respect for the work they they have done and to understand the difficulties of their position. If you want to change the way they are teaching reading, you will have to gain their respect and affection. You will also have to wait until the books they have now start to wear out. What you can do is to offer some sort of compromise. Of course, you shouldn't remove the books. It is to be hoped that the principal will recognize that you are correct and that the teachers will, too, once given a chance to cool down (and shown that you respect what they are trying to do). I can think of the following reasons why the books need to remain on the shelves: * many students will have a need for significant titles like these when they are not studying them in class * some students will transfer into the school or out of it and should not be deprived of a geat novel just because they aren't at your school for every year * with the range of reading level, it sounds like not every student will read every book, anyway. Although people who read at the third grade level should not be made to read a book at the eighth grade level in class (and vice versa) they should be able to choose to read good books at any reading level * some students may want to re-read books that they have read in class * the library program should support the whole school and not be hobbled to support one particular aspect of the instructional program You could also offer to make the following concessions: * don't book talk or otherwise "push" titles which are on the list The above, I think, is a good choice. The following are things you could offer but which I don't feel as good about: * label the copies you have so that students will know that they have chosen a book which they may have to read again * reduce the number of copies that you have on the shelves (if you have seven copies of a particular title, cut it down to two) Best of luck! We English teachers aren't really that bad-- give us a chance to get over our inflexibility and we might even be friendly. The fact that you are concerned for supporting their program and reading in the school will come through over time. Don't make the mistake of believing that the most vocal or emotional teachers really speak for the group-- probably everybody else has been yelled at, too, and they're quiet about it because they're glad that it's you this time and not them. Doug Knight fdknight@teleport.com LMS Certification in Process Language Arts/ Social Studies Astoria Middle School, CyberSchool http://www.cyberschool.k12.or.us/~knight/holocaust/index.htm =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv For LM_NET Help & Archives see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=