Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I hope everyone has had a wonderful holiday season. I am trying to get back on track and tie up loose ends, including informing sharing information gained from queries I posted in December. One request had to do with whether or not it was true that valuable coins show up in Salvation Army kettles annually during the Christmas season. I received many interesting replies verifying incidents in Chicago, Iowa, and elsewhere. It appears that once this custom got started, others picked it up in various locations resulting in numerous generous gifts. My teacher used the information as part of a lesson she was presenting and was impressed and appreciative. I also posted a question about Accelerated Reader use. I was wanting common sense guidelines, particularly regarding how to encourage teachers to not be rigidly locked in to narrow level requirements and how to encourage reading of non-AR books. Once again I was rewarded with a number of helpful replies. The consensus is that AR should be regarded a management system (of course, but in some cases takes on a life of its own), and that it does help to "hang loose" regarding levels. I am hoping that having others echo my sentiments will lend credence to my suggestions along these lines. Several respondents said they go by points alone rather than homing in on the levels, an idea I will try to promote. I am attaching some of the responses which pretty well sum up what I hope to convey. If anyone else wants to add words of wisdom, I would love to hear--will be meeting with teachers this Tuesday to discuss AR. "We have the AR program at our school and students are encouraged to read in a zone around their reading level and we have lots of AR tests, however, let me comment about being hard and fast about these levels. Teachers and media specialists must reserve the right to individual judgment and students should get approval for any book they read." "We are using AR at our school as an adjunct. Our kids are mostly on grade level and all have to take the Scholastic Reading Inventory, SAT and a new test in Florida called FCAT. I have trained all the teachers on how to use AR without going overboard. I refuse to put the reading level on the book itself, nor will I put the points. I have worked with the program in other schools and have seen it work well without having to use STAR, ZPD's, or at risk reports. Let the kids read what they want; after all , we are trying to encourage recreational reading. If they are not happy with the amount of points they are accumulating, they will naturally gravitate towards higher level books. We have decided on a schoolwide point goal as opposed to individual classes competing against each other for points. No school store either; reading should be rewarding without extrinsic rewards." > > "If the teachers are interested in or feel the need to have AR be included as part of a grade, I would like to share with you how a 5th grade teacher of below grade level readers handled AR. This was a class of almost all boys who, prior to AR, had only been perusers of sports and drawing books. She gave them extra credit points toward their grade if they made 80% or above on the tests. Some of them didn't believe her at first and then one child ended up with an A (he had never gotten one) and then it caught on like wildfire. She only limited them by having them not read below a certain grade level...I think it was fourth because that was where they were in their ability >group..... They could read anything above it, but only got points for each test that was 80% or above, so it didn't punish them if they stretched >themselves. " ">We use AR 2-6. Our guidelines are pretty easy. The teachers and I work >together to decide what is a minimum reading level for their class, and >sometimes by student is they have a child with special concerns in their class. We also work together to decide what is a reasonable point goal. We use monthly goals. Children who reach or surpass their monthly goal >earn the right to come to a theme party one afternoon during school. The monthly goals can change depending on what holidays we have or what is >going on in the class room. If they are doing a large research paper or grad rule package the goal may be lowered that month. If a student has a book they really want to read that is below their approved reading level they bring it to me or their teacher for approval. No big deal, no big >hassle, the children are allowed to read what they want within reason. If a student is only wanting to read books way below their level it is not >approved. But if they discover a book they really think is interesting >they are allowed to read and test. "My observation is that serious readers rapidly take the >"easy" tests, get bored, and move on to literature that interests them. >They are also more likely to try other genres, too. > The "non-reading" students will actually catch themselves enjoying >something they have read. I try to create tests on mythology, folklore, >etc. for these students because they have never discovered the joy of >being lost in a book." "I worked in a middle school that very successfully used AR. Let me tell you how. First off, you have to have a principal backing it so teachers will use >it 100%. My sixth grade used it every six week grading period. They had to have >read two books and passed tests on each book. Unless the teacher told >me, the grade level had to be 4.5 or higher. When teachers conferenced >with parents, the proof was in black and white whether the student >really read as assigned. In seventh grade, we went completely by points. Every six weeks, honors students had to get a certain number of points, regular another number. >It worked very well. " "I am the librarian in a small (63 students, grades 1-12) private school for students with dyslexia. The teachers in grades 3 - 8 use AR for their outside reading assignments. The scores count as one test grade. My teacher for grades 9 - 12 uses AR differently. It is optional. Depending on what a student scores, he/she has up to five points added to their final six-weeks grade. She uses it as extra credit. We have no "store", no levels of certification, no wall of fame. My students read at whatever level the teacher believes they can handle. If a student does poorly on a test, he/she has the option to take the test again (at a lower grade) or read a second book on a lower level."> I hope this information helps somebody else as it has me. Many thanks to everyone who replied to my queries, especially during the busy month of December. Happy 1999!--Mary Ann ***?***?***?***?***?***?***?***?*** "Try curiosity."--Dorothy Parker ***?***?***?***?***?***?***?***?*** Mary Ann Bell, Librarian York Junior High School Conroe ISD, TX mbell@main.com mbell@conroe.isd.tenet.edu =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 3) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv For LM_NET Help & Archives see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=