Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Although this book has been discussed thoroughly, when my friend and colleague, John Bishop, sent me his sensitive and thoughtful analysis of the book, I thought the group might enjoy reading it. ------ Forwarded Message Follows ------- To: berdoshs Subject: Re: (Fwd) Re: Giving Tree Send reply to: bishopj@high.mtps.com Date sent: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 18:44:50 -0600 OK, Selena. Your point is well-taken...I understand...and agree. When I first read this book, I must admit I was moved nearly to tears. I empathized with both characters...the forsaken yet steadfast woman-tree who offers unconditional love...and the unrecognizing, searching boy-man who, at last, finds the peace and companionship he desperately sought there waiting. The often conflicting feelings of love, dependence, and independence intertwined throughout the story were brought to an almost overwhelming emotional level as I read the final words of the characters' bittersweet reunion. I imagined not only myself...but a universal constant of human relationships...in these characters. God and (wo)man...wife and husband...parent and child...all embarking on a painful journey of desire and discovery...to end, hopingly, in recognition and respect. I feel that many people who read this story are initially moved at this emotional level...leaving them with admiration for the woman- tree...wistfully hoping there will be someone like this for them (or wishing they could be like this for someone they love)...and sympathy for the boy-man...projecting themselves and their all-to- human desires onto that searching soul. But then there are those who go beyond the initial impact and consider the deeper meanings of the story and its characters. They see the emotional glow as sexist subterfuge to be stripped away...exposing the unseemly undercurrents of selfishness and self-deprecation. The woman-tree is an enabler...inappropriately optimistic and void of self-respect. The boy-man is a user...selfish and disrespectful. The message of the story spoils from affirmation to depression...abhorrent to all ideals of fairness and social justice. So...for those open to it...The Giving Tree touches the reader on two distinct emotional levels. One can be moved and motivated by the first...but can be occluded and outraged by the second. Perhaps a tangential level, more intellectual than emotional, is the consideration of the author's intent. It is difficult to imagine Mr. Silverstein's intent as to turn a simple tale of unconditional love...unaware of his creation's social undercurrents. Then, is it sufficient to conclude that he was fully aware of both the emotional impact and social undercurrents...using them for the seemingly evil purpose of passing a "bad" message for "good"? (Brian Burrell in the May/June 1999 issue of American Heritage seems to take this view, stating "This overrated picture book thus presents as a paradigm for young children a callously exploitive human relationship - both across genders and across generations.") Or, can we allow ourselves to consider his intent a step further...to suppose not social evil but intellectual maliciousness? Perhaps he intended to create a literary vehicle...complete with an increasingly murky mix of emotion and meaning...to incrementally engage the reader...and move those open to it, by personal and public reflection, discussion, and possible division, to a deeper consideration of the duality or even multiplicity of sometimes conflicting perspectives in which we view the content and value of human relationships and experiences. Certainly, the last is a quite large step to take. However if this was Mr. Silverstein's intent, then, as evidenced by our on-going discussions of his controversial work, he has surely succeeded. -JB- Selena Berdosh Moorestown HS Media Center Moorestown, NJ USA berdoshs@high.mtps.com =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 3) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv For LM_NET Help & Archives see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=