Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Listen closely, Superintendent. Your District/State has invested a significant amount of money into your libraries for which your parents, teachers, and students expect a quality return in information. Your library is ALREADY out-of-date. You are already failing to provide the information that is expected to fit the needs of the curriculum and your school system. Consider, if you will, that you ask your principal or guidance officer to provide a list of the names of the students in a school and you get either a hand-typed list that took hours to do or, worse, a computer printout that contains a random mixture of student addresses, some zip codes, a little bit of grades, and a few student names all of which are neatly labelled "Students Names". What has happened, of course, is that the records have not been correctly entered or there is no common definitions for each of the fields used. MARC, used throughout the world's libraries, provides such definitions for information used by the library to provide efficient access to information. The field -082 is ALWAYS the Dewey Decimal Number. The author field is ALWAYS the author. When your students enquire about a title, the title ALWAYS comes up. What is the second reason? Certainly you are aware of the remarkable potential of the Internet and resource sharing. I can, if I have previous arrangements, access a library in Washington State through their sites, borrow materials, locate additional resources, and a whole range of other services that libraries are increasingly asked to provide but which, also increasingly, individual libraries can no longer provide. All such sharing and all future developments occur using the MARC system. I know of no library that would even consider permitting me reciprocal access without a commonly defined records system. What may concern you is the initial cost. Granted, there are a variety of ways to develop the library's MARC records, some more expensive than others. Some computer catalog programs allow for retrospective cataloguing using disks like Books in Print or the LCMARC records, others encourage you to submit a list of items in your collection and they will provide the records. The question is whether it is worth it or not. And, from my own experience of some 30 years, a typical outlay of $10,000 for programs and records well pays for itself in simply considering the man/woman hours required for a paper catalog. It well pays for itself in providing effective access to information. And, it says something when students return from a MARC-based university library to thank the librarian that they were already familiar with the computerized system when they arrived when others weren't. Education, like a business, requires active support of practices that will make the delivery more effective while, at the same time, cutting unwarranted expenses. Of course, the final argument : when you go to the State Convention of Superintendents and be able to brag, nonchallantly of course, that your libraries are computerized using the high standards of the Library of Congress (MARC!), while that "other superintendent" still is in the dark ages........ That you libraries can interconnect with any library in the world AND borrow materials, too....... That your libraries are saving you lots of money and getting rave reviews from parents, teachers, students, and school board members..... Don't you think it's worth it? Earl Earl Sande Secondary School Librarian International School of Tanganyika Post Office Box 2651 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (e-mail : sandes@afsat.com) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 3) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv For LM_NET Help & Archives see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=