Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Dear Sandra At Palmerston, we have abandoned any artificial grading of books, with the exception of a small 'senior fiction' section whose content may be unsuitable for younger readers. We have several reasons for this. 1. Reading ability and interests seldom correlate to grade level. 2. Students need to be able to choose a challenge if they wish. 3. Older students who cannot cope with those books deemed applicable to their grade level will not use the library at all if there is any risk they might be seen selecting from a younger level. By having all the books together, each reader can choose without fear of ridicule. 4.Picture books are written for all age groups, and I have just had a most successful semester getting my senior students to read and select the Australian Picture Book of the Century. Most of the Top 10 could have been read by younger students, but the underlying message would have been missed. 5. For this reason, we have shelved the books so that the picture books by author 'A' are on the same shelf as the chapter books by author 'A', although at opposite ends. 6.Who has the time/ skill to level each book, and how would you reach a consensus? We have a most capable literacy team who do this for the readers that are used in the classrooms, but to do it for the library's resources would be a daunting task. 7. What we do do, however, is identify those chapter books that are written for our emergent readers (ie those just becoming independent) with a little coloured dot near the barcode. This helps both student and parent to know that it is a book that will support the developing reading skills. 8. All the non-fiction are classified (Dewey) and shelved together. Little kids love information books, and even if they cannot read the words, they get heaps from looking at the pictures. We often overhear the most amazing discussions between our Kindies! 9. There are those who subscribe to the five-finger method of book selection. In this, the student is told to select a page at random, and read it. each time they come to a word they don't know, they put up a finger. If there are five fingers up before the end of the page then the book is too difficult. 10. What I prefer to tell the children, is that they don't have to read every book they choose. If they find it is too difficult, or boring, then they can just bring it back and change it. That's what I do in my public library, and it helps the children to form judgements about the sorts of things they like to read, and the elements of good writing. I apologise for being a bit long-winded but we put a lot of thought into these decisions as we made them and have actually written them into our management policy. I hope they don't confuse you even further! Cheers Barbara Barbara Braxton Teacher Librarian Palmerston District Primary School PALMERSTON ACT 2913 AUSTRALIA T. 02 6205 6162 F. 02 6205 7242 E. barbara@dynamite.com.au W. http://www.palmdps.act.edu.au "Together, we learn from each other." -----Original Message----- From: Sandra Schilke <sschilke@sendit.SENDIT.NODAK.EDU> To: LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU <LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> Date: Saturday, 30 October 1999 7:05 Subject: Arranging books by grade >There has been much discussion in our K-6 schools with the library >aides regarding how books should be arranged in the library. >One idea is to have separate book sections for picture books, grades 1-2, >grades 3-4, grades 5-6. Nonfiction and fiction books are divided within >each. >Another thought is that there should be an Easy section for grades 1-2. >The second section would include gr.3-6 fiction and gr.3-6 nonfiction. We >would appreciate the pros and cons of both and what works >for you. >The grade caught in the middle is third grade as some are able to read easy >books, and others are ready for more difficult material. How do we help >them find appropriate material? >Any suggestions for teaching children how to select a book with an >appropriate reading level for them are also welcome. Thanks. > >-- >Sandra Schilke, Elementary Library Media Specialist >Williston School District #1, Williston, ND 58801 >sschilke@sendit.nodak.edu > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= >All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. >To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: >listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: >1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST >4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv. >For LM_NET Help see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ >Archives: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.html >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-= > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv. For LM_NET Help see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archives: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.html =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=