Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Below are the responses that I received to my question about weeding the 900's in my K-8 library. They were very helpful and I am forging ahead weeding out those dusty old tomes with black and white pictures. Now--if anybody has run into anything really terrific (particularly in the vein of American History, especially wars), would you please drop me a line? I heavily weeded the 900 section at the school I was at last year. I made my choices based on age of book, condition, usage. The history may still be correct, but if kids aren't using it find something new. I work in a high school but here are some general guidelines I use. Obviously I discard any book that is beat up or that is not attractive to students. When considering whether to keep or discard a book I try to recall if it is one connected to a course that is actually being taught. Is there any interest in the topic among students outside of class assignments? If the answer is no to the two questions I will probably discard it. This is particularly true with books on wars, weapons, etc. I have seen a sudden drop off of interest in those topics among the students. No need keeping a book that will not get used. I keep anything that is primary source and everything on key events (Vietnam, WWI and II, Holocaust specific). The rest I'll look at copyright dates and conditions. What condition is the book in? What does the cover look like? the maps and illustrations? Is the dust cover - if it has one - in tatters? Toss and replace the bad ones. I feel sure you would be justified in weeding anything more than 10 years old or in bad shape. If you are unsure about throwing out the baby with the bathwater, check the titles you identify for discard in one of Wilson's Standard Catalog series or something similar (an opening day collection, etc.). Weeding can always be a challenge. Here are a few guidelines I follow. I keep history books unless, they are torn up. After checking the condition of the book, check out the last time it circulated in your library. If it has not moved in 3-5 years, you either have better books on the subject or it doesn't work with my curriculum. Also, it the book has history errors I would remove it. If your school or district does not have a WEEDING policy, why don't you help develop one. I heard somewhere that you should never get rid of local history of state history stuff. I just went through part of my U.S. history section with our high school ap teacher. He said to get rid of anything that doesn't use the term Native American or American Indian and anything with Negro unless is is original source document. Also, check the copyright on your country material. Haven't started on the world history yet. As you and I know, weeding in a school library should take into consideration both curriculum and student interest. When it comes to curriculum, however, the curriculum can change. I had a 5th grade teacher who was *required* to teach American history from the Revolution through the Civil War, but one year he decided to have the kids do an extra project on wars that America has fought including the French & Indian War, the War of 1812, the 20th century world wars, and Korea and Vietnam. I was glad I had a book or two on those wars. Also, some kids love to read about history and especially about wars and battles, soldiers and guns. Interest would dictate that you have WELL DONE books on those subjects. Old copyrights with black and white photos may not appeal any more. I'm thinking of such oldies from the 60's and 70's as the books by C. B. Colby which were very popular at the time, and would not be valid now, such as "Our Space Age Navy" 1962. That definitely goes out.(That book might be in the 300's.) Alternately, his book, "Fighting Gear of World War I", which might be in the 600's or 900's, might still be useful even if it is black and white. As for MOST American Heritage titles and Time-Life titles, although they are in color -- in fact they often have interesting pictures -- the text is hard to follow, unclear, and doesn't concentrate on facts that kids would want to know....they are just about useless for research. -- We are beginning to get new history books for elementary and middle school. Two good writers are: Joy Hakim (gr. 4-6) and Albert Marrin (gr. 6-8). On the other hand, I don't find that the huge series called "Cornerstones of Freedom" from Children's Press works well with kids. I think these books, written to a formula, are boring. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv. For LM_NET Help see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archives: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.html =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=