Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Below is the compiled list of all hits sent to me! Remember that Scholastic gives you paperbacks as a premium for having books fairs . They are at no cost to you. Use them - they are inexpensive, last most of the time and are well liked by the kids - having 2 harry potter paperbacks are great when none are around. Remember a statistic - only 20percent of books circulate regularly -and in terms of hardbacks that can be expensive. My students like them too, and I get many of them from donations and book fairs. What I like is being able to offer a bigger selection of fiction to the kids, and if the book is a classic, or stays popular I'll buy a copy in hardcover (usually Permabound). Some of the series the kids like don't stay popular for long and I would be stuck with 50 books to toss. They hold up pretty well, I cover them with laminate. I have a lot of paperbacks. I have not noticed much of a preference either way. If there is a popular title that all the kids are reading, they don't care if it is paperback or hardback. I have found in my own school (and this does not go for all schools) that kids will browse either section. Do paperbacks hold up? Not for many many years, but even hardbacks don't hold up after repeated reading. I have many harbacks that have seen better days and have had to be replaced due to their popularity. I know paperbacks don't last as long, but they are cheaper, so I look at it as pretty much being the same cost in the end, since their lives are a little shorter. I pick them up when I am at used book sales or a few when I am at a bookstore and use library fines to pay for them. I only buy books like the Stephen Kings and the ones that I know the kids will read, though. In order to extend their lives, a little contact paper over the cover at least helps keep the cover on for a lot longer, which is what is always the first thing to go on paperbacks. Of course, you can also use thost hard plastic covers which turn a paperback into a hardback but I am not really a fan of those, and certainly not for fiction because books with that stuff on them makes them feel unpleasant to hold for some reason. Shiela, Paperbacks will hold up much longer if you use a binding stapler (less than $200 - a good investment) and cover the books with a laminating product. You can order rolls or precut jackets from library supply catalogs, but the volunteers I have worked with liked the good ol' clear Contact Paper. We bought the 8 yard rolls. Depending on size, you'd get about 20+ paperbacks covered for less than 50 cents each. You don't need to overlap the top or bottom edges of the book, they seldom get enough wear to justify it, but the open side edges get lots of use. Trim off the ragged starting edge. Measure the distance of the book across the front cover, spine, and back cover, and add 1/2 to 2 inches to that measurement for the front and back cover overlap. Mark this distance along the long bottom edge of the paper side of the roll, rolling out as much as you need. Then measure the height of the book and draw a line up from the original mark, then carefully draw across the center section at exactly the same distance. Cut very carefully as your cover is an exact fit top to bottom. (Note that the precut bottom edge of the roll will be the bottom edge of the covering). When doing several books, do all of the same sizes together (less waste). You can use the top edge for another set. Save the ribbon of leftover middle for repairing books or small lamination jobs. Before covering over a barcode you need to use, try out a piece of Contact over an old barcode. I've never had a problem scanning through it, but you never know. You can have student volunteers cover your books but do stress that you want them done slowly and perfectly (it takes some time to get the hang of it)with no air pockets or wrinkles, and with about the same amount of overlap at each end of the cover sides (less than 1/2" may not stay stuck). Be sure the spines are sealed flat without gaps. Use a book bone or wood edge of a ruler for a better bond once it's on straight. Use a straight pin at an angle to carefully lance any air bubbles and squeeze them out. I found that popular paperbacks "pre-bound" this way (stapled and covered)last 3 to 5 times as long as uncovered books. When you use the binding stapler, make sure there is enough room on the inside margins to staple and use the appropriate length staple. Do the center one(s) first, then at least one more to each side (top and bottom of spine). Joanne Ladewig "Library Lady" at Lawrence Elementary Garden Grove, California The elementary librarian before me didn't put out any paperback books. When I came there were over 500 paperbacks in the back room that were free books from book fairs. I put them out on the selves with the rest of the collection and when they get worn we would throw them out. But it has been five years since we put them out and I've only had to discard a couple of them. So I would say they work well in an elementary library. Also, all the primary Guided Reading books and the AR books are paperback. In my opinion does not seem to make any difference. If you have alot of paperbacks get a hot glue gun fixes the very well. I use the stickon plastic covers. I have many that have 25-50 cir. Shelia - I buy lots of paperbacks, especially for "popular" fiction like Stephen King. We cover each one with clear laminate (Vistafoil is one brand name) and the book typically outlasts the interest in it. Most of the public libraries around here have one or two used book sales per year (patrons donate their slightly used books & the library uses the proceeds to support programs, buy books, etc). At these sales, the prices are usually $1 per hardcover and $.50 for paperbacks. I stock up on all the most popular authors (King, Higgins Clark, Grisham, etc) and spend my budget on more expensive reference books and the like. I have many paperbacks - mostly fiction. When I came here the fiction section was so pathetic. Since then I've purchased hundreds of paperbacks. The students love them. They're lighter, easier to carry and easier to hold and they look much more enticing than the hardbacks. Are these good enough reasons? If our goal is to help students become life-long readers, then I think we should do whatever it takes! I can get three paperbacks for the price of one hardback and I often purchase 3 and 4 copies of one title so that students can read the "now" titles. I could never afford to do this with hardbacks. We cover our paperbacks with clear contact paper - makes a big difference in their shelf life. I'll be interested in hearing what other librarians say on this subject because I am always having to defend purchasing paperbacks in discussions with my librarian friends. to me it's a no-brainer. What good is "long lasting, library bound" book that just sits on the shelf??? Hope this info is helpful. Let me know if you have any questions. One more plus for paperbacks - I purchase them from a local book store at 20% discount and 3 day delivery if not in stock so the books get on the shelf (in the wire racks) much sooner. The paper backs don't last, however, I still buy them for the popular books. (I'm not sure that hardbacks with regular binding instead of library binding last much longer than the paperbacks). This way I can have several copies in the hands of the kids, not just one. When they fall apart I send a copy or two to the local bindery. The price of the bindery + the cost of the paper back is still less than the cost of a hardback. they certainly attrack more teen readers than hardback, i interfile all my fiction together - for longer life I run a piece of clear book tape done the spine - that extends the life a little longer - be warned that you will have to replace ones like Stephen King, etc. because of use - i often buy at used book stores the high traffic pbks No, they don't hold up as well. But the kids prefer them overwhelmingly I have weeded so many hardbacks that have only circulated once or twice that I much prefer paperbacks. Because of the length of the books, we just do not see the circulation that elem libraries do. The kids prefer paperbacks anyway. NO, they don't hold up. A popular book can be looking pretty sorry by the end of the year. Try Permabound or Bound to Stay Bound. They last for years. we have thundreds, (probably a few thousand) of paperbacks in our leisure reading section. They are only entered in the automation system by author/title. They are the first place students head when looking for recreational reading. We purchase other books in paperback format if we think they won't be heavily used. Or, we purchase multiple copies of heavy demand items in paperback format. For example, we have 8-10 copies of each of the Chicken Soup books in that format. No, paperbacks do not hold up and I really hate having them - but the kids like them so.............. The paperbacks, while cheaper, cannot hold up as well and as long as the hardcover books. I do add additional copies in paperback if a title is in great demand, but I like to have the hardcover in the collection first. I'm a little late in posting because I haven't read my email lately, but I thought I would give you some input. This is my first year as a hs/ms librarian and I have been buying a lot of paperbacks. Obviously, not everything I buy is paperback. The collection I inherited is fairly outdated and paperback give me a way to get "caught up" in the fiction. At the high school level, paperbacks are working well. I cover them and use book bumpers for added protection, but overall, not too much of a problem. At the middle school, however, I'm not having as much success. Books that are widely popular (the Captain Underpants Series) are going to have to be purchased in hardback because they are always checked out...and look well-worn. My philosophy is that if I need to replace a paperback then I should spend the money to buy the hard copy. I have been told by publisher's reps that paperbacks are made with a life expectancy of 3 years. I have paperbacks in my 1-3 library, beacuse they are donated or from the Scholastic book fair. I've found the covering the cover with clear contact makes them last longer. I just noticed a small error in my directions - where it says trim off the ragged starting edge I am referring to the roll of Contact Paper, not a ragged edge of a paperback. Make a note of that on your original copy if it's confusing. Sorry! Re: the paperback vs. hardbacks argument, I always thought that the teens (in h.s. at least) prefered the paperbacks. I find that this is true for the most part. However, about two weeks ago, an ESL student, when given the choice between the hc and pbk of a particular title, took the hc. Her reason? the print was bigger and there was more white around the print, making it easier for her to read, she thought. Made me rethink my ideas a little.. Shelia Amos,Teacher Amelia Middle School Amelia, VA she_she61_@hotmail.com _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST, etc.) send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv. For LM_NET Help see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archives: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.shtml See also EL-Announce for announcements from library media vendors: http://www.mindspring.com/~el-announce/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=