Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Hello all, I apologize for the delay in posting. I received many kind and thoughtful responses. I'm still on the fence but I think that I'm going to catalog Dewey. Many thanks, Chris Beardsley Librarian Darrow School New Lebanon, NY Since the author will be included in the MARC record as a searchable item, I would assign a Dewey number. Compilations can always list individual composers and/or artists in the Notes. Students will probably be searching for composers or artists, but when they go the bin ( or shelf) they will then be browsing related items, just like books I think this a case for organizing like they do the records in stores but this can be done Dewey numbers. You may have to carry the number out a long way. I liked the break down for children's, country, Pop, etc. that was in Dewey 20 when used with 4 places past the decimal I would then organize under the performer except in classical where if they did one only Mozart would go under Mozart then orchestra, performer, or conductor. But just my way. I am sure how ever you do it students will figure it out. We have a large collection which we catalog by composer. Definitely easier way for the kids to browse! This is only a personal opinion. I have very few CD's but decided to assign dewey numbers as if they were books. On the spine label, where Ref would go, I put CD. It just didn't make sense to me to have Basie, Celtic strings and Mozart under the same number. What it always comes down to, for me, is what helps the patron. Filing by the author would be more user friendly in my humble opinion. We too have a large recording collection and I opted to go with the Dewey number so that musical genres are together (operas, symphonies, etc.). Frequently there are more than one composer's work on a recording so what do you do then if you just do a composer designation? I worked for a few years in Columbia University's Music Library and they had a large recording collection and their's was carefully cataloged. New York Public Library at Lincoln Center (the performing arts collection) is a great source for cataloging. When I last used it records were not downloadable but I could print them and that was a huge help =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=- All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. LM_NET Help & Information: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archive: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.shtml LM_NET Select/EL-Announce: http://www.cuenet.com/archive/el-announce/ LM_NET Supporters: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ven.html =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-