Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
>Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 16:47:46 -0500 >To: VANEESAT@AOL.COM >From: Dorothy Tissair <dtissair@snet.net> >Subject: Re: SEC: Parental request > >At 11:54 PM 1/31/2002 -0500, you wrote: > >>I really don't understand why all the discussion of this topic. > >Because we were well schooled in Freedom of Information and ALA's stand. > >>As a parent, >>I would hope that my request would be honored. > >Yes and no. I don't believe that the original post listed the school >level of the girl in question and most Middle Schools and many Elementary >Schools now have Guidance Departments. My attitude might be quite >different for a 17 year old than a 12 year old. In this case, however, >the parents have not only made the request to the school library, but have >backed it up with documentation from a Psychologist and the Guidance >Department. This would imply that there are some serious mental health >issues involved with this particular case. Restricting this girl's access >to information is probably being advised to help prevent harm to her or >those around her. > >This is not a sexually active15 year old who needs information on >abortion, birth control, or homosexuality. Suicide is the #1 killer of >teens today. We also have to remember Columbine and other incidents of >violence when we allow minors access to information. > >This girl's parents need school support. > >>In our age of automation, it >>is not that much trouble to place a notice on a patron's name. > >Yes, if Blockbuster Video can place a notification warning on their access >to children, I think we need to consider it as well. I had 15 year olds >complain when I told them that they needed parental consent to rent a >movie (the school and public libraries where I also worked part-time only >allowed ADULT access to videos). They would stomp out and bring their >parent back in. Frequently the parent would rent the movie for them, but >generally not until they had asked me why it was rated the way it was. > > >>And yes, I understand freedom of information. But has anyone decided at what >>age that freedom starts. > >Only the film and video game industry and then it is voluntary. > >>Is a child free to read what ever he or she likes >>with or without their parents consent? > >For the most part yes. > > >>Yes, I also understand that many children will sneak around to do that which >>is forbidden. > >This will happen even in the most liberal households. Kids who know that >they are free to read anything they wish will keep some things private. > >>And it is unfortunate that the parent in question has chosen >>restrictions rather than discussions. > >They may and probably have discussed their family values with their >child. From my experience some of the most "restrictive" of parents have >probably had more discussion of values with their young than have most parents. > >>But their request must be upheld. >>They are, after all the parents. > >This is exactly the point. We do not have to agree with the parents >views, that is why we chose to have the broad spectrum of information that >we have in the library. However, as teachers we are also required to >provide assistance to parents with differing views. > >>Further, the question was raised about whether this same request was made at >>the public library. Why should it be made? > >Kids frequently go to the public library after school and some parents do >make requests like this there if they and their child are both well known >the request may be considered. > >>The parent is able to accompany >>the child at the public library and monitor what she checks out personally. > >This idea would probably me the first that would be made to a parent >making such a request. > > >>I say go ahead and honor the parents request. This is not a battle that I >>would choose to fight. > >Most of the time I wouldn't either and I am sure even fewer of our >employers would care to fight it. This is why you don't hear a fight >against filters coming from the national association of school boards. > > >>Anyway, that is my two cents worth (more from a parents perspective), > >My two as well > > >>Vaneesa Thompson >>Library Media Specialist >>Hazlewood High School >>Town Creek, AL >>Vaneesat@aol.com > >Dorothy E. Tissair, M.L.S. >Library Media Specialist >Old Saybrook, CT 06475 > >dtissair@snet.net =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST, etc.) send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv. For LM_NET Help see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archives: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.shtml See also EL-Announce for announcements from library media vendors: http://www.mindspring.com/~el-announce/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=