Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Several people were interested in the responses I received concerning a parental request to restrict access to occult books. The responses were about evenly split between doing as the parent asks and its opposite, not limiting the student as to check outs. There were some interesting points made on both sides of the issue. I have not yet had a chance to discuss the details of the request and to explore our district policy, if any, in this matter. I'm thinking of trying some sort of compromise in which a member of her educational team, someone more knowledgeable as to the parents' concerns, can guide her in her selections whenever she comes to media. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Have an acquisition policy that is clear and supported by the administration. Show it to the parent. Be willing to listen, then explain the policy. If they want to pursue the matter, the proper channels are (or should be) in the policy. If the parent wishes to censor what their child is reading, they should expect to be at their side wherever they borrow the material. Most librarians and their assistants rarely have the time to constantly monitor what a child is taking home. A funny example -- a 9th grade student checked out a copy of Roth's "Portnoy's Complaint." When the book became overdue, we found that the parent had thrown the book away. She said she would buy a new copy when we contacted her -- of course, she didn't. To me, that's censorship. If she didn't want her child to read the book, she could have returned it so that another child without the restriction from their parents could read it. Enough said. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I think my first line of response would be that the parents should communicate with their child what they want her to check out (you did not say how old the girl was). It is their responsibility as parents and the child's responsibility, not yours. In my situation I have a student not able to check out Harry Potter books, though she looks at them on the shelves. She knows that her parent does not approve and therefore does not check them out. This is a 4th grader. I also comply with a parent request. I feel they are the child's parent and as long as they are not asking me to take it off of the shelf I should comply with their wishes for their child. I have had no other parents request that their child(ren) not take out specific books. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I feel that students, even young ones, should be given the opportunity to select their own books. BUT, I also feel that parents have the absolute right to censor their OWN child's reading. If they call or write and ask that I steer THEIR child away from a certain book, author, or topic, I will respect their wishes. This is my policy and it has worked for me for many years. It also keeps the parents on my side because they know where I stand. I have had only a handful of these requests in the past 16 years. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Praise the parent for being caring and involved with what their child reads. Invite them to come with their child's class (given administrative approval) if they are younger, come before or after school to supervise/help select materials they feel appropriate with their child. Inform them of the problems inherent for us to do accomplish that (aides, volunteers, systems not permitting notes, making the child stand out from the others, definitions of what is appropriate....). I actually acquired two excellent volunteers this way. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parents have a responsibility to their children; we, as employees of a school district, financed and governed by people who pay our salaries, have a responsibility to try to reflect and uphold community values while balancing them with our own professional philosophies and obligations. I have said, with a smile, to parents, "I will try to see that your child does not check out a specific book, but I cannot promise; that's ultimately yours and the child's responsibility." I do try. And I also tell my students, "You know what your parents want you to read and not read. Please respect that and don't embarrass any of us." I think a little common sense and understanding is always in order while we do our best to protect the rights of our patrons. Whoever said it was going to be an easy job?! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Along those same lines, at what point do you hold the child responsible? I'm thinking here about a situation where a child checks out an expensive book and severely damages or loses it. Do you ask the parents to pay, or the child? I suspect that most of us would expect the parents to cover the loss. Why, then, should we not accept their ideas about what is or is not acceptable for their children to read? I'm not talking about what is purchased for the library, only about what a particular child checks out. Rights and responsibilities go together. If the parent is responsible for the child's loss, then the parent also has the right to say what the child may or may not check out. If we're going to say that we will permit children to check out materials against the known wishes of the parents, then the children must also be accountable for any losses, not their parents. Someone mentioned earlier today that the public library gives library cards to children over 12 without the parent's signature. In many states children under 18 cannot legally enter into contracts. Since a library card is evidence of a contract, I suspect that if a child over 12 but under 18 checked out materials and failed to return them, the only recourse the library would have would be to cancel the library card. Certainly the parents would not be responsible, and since the child was under the legal age to enter into a contract, the child wouldn't be responsible, either. I realize that many of you feel that if material meets your selection guides it is appropriate for all students in your building, and no one should overrule you without going through a formal challenge process. That isn't the situation that started this thread. The parents simply asked that their child not be permitted to check out any books on a certain topic. They didn't ask for those books to be removed from the shelves. Nothing is being censored. The parents simply asked the school to help them enforce their own rules with their own children. Joyce Massey, Media Specialist Maranacook Community School 1001 Main St. Readfield, ME 04355 207-685-4923, ext. 324 massej@mcs.csd10.k12.me.us =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST, etc.) send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv. For LM_NET Help see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archives: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.shtml See also EL-Announce for announcements from library media vendors: http://www.mindspring.com/~el-announce/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=