Previous by DateNext by Date Date Index
Previous by ThreadNext by Thread Thread Index
LM_NET Archive



THANKS TO ALL! Your opinions help to guide my decisions.

 ----- Original Message -----
 From: Julie Masterson <Julie_Masterson/HFL@HFL.MONROE.EDU>
 To: <LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
 Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:03 PM
 Subject: Target: Flexible vs. Fixed Scheduling in Elementary Schools


 > Okay, I have read the research on flexible vs. fixed scheduling in
 elementary
 > schools, now I'd like to hear the opinions of the professionals.  What do
 you
 > think?
 >
 > Julie Masterson-Smith
 > Manor School Library Media Specialist
 > Honeoye Falls, NY 14472
 > Julie_Masterson@hfl.monroe.edu





Subject:
         Re: Target: Flexible vs. Fixed Scheduling in Elementary Schools


 Julie-
        Please post or send the replies on to me, if you don't mind. We are
 undergoing a discussion in my district on a "variation", i.e. seeing 3rd
 graders for 3 months, 4th graders for the next 3 months, etc. I have grave
 doubts about this. But I am not totally close minded.


 Amy Ipp
 Glenwood School
 Short Hills Nj
 Lu83@aol.com


 cc:

 Subject:
         Re: Target: Flexible vs. Fixed Scheduling in Elementary Schools


 Julie:  Not a professional here; but I feel like one after working as a
 librarian assistant with the same librarian for 9 yrs.

 We have a combined flexible with fixed schedule.  To make sure every student
 is given the chance to check-out, each class has one 15 min. c/o time
 weekly.....they may come back at any time during the school week and day to
 return their books for another one with teacher's permission.  ALL of the
 time we are open for anything the teachers request......small group research,
 small group pleasure reading, whole class research w/ teacher assisting,
 small group reading enrichment assisted by the librarian, computer research,
 small group or individual check-outs, etc.

 We feel with the flexible schedule, that the children get their hands on the
 books more ........ they actually get and enjoy more hands on time with
 books.  The children feel it is an absolute privilege to enjoy the library
 away from a whole class setting.....they appear to appreciate books more when
 they have more quiet one on one time with a book away from the multitude of
 children in their class after they have finished their daily classwork.  It
 is also a privilege to the librarians to be able to deal with the children on
 a more one on one basis.....we feel that we have more input on their
 education that way.

 Judy Magee
 Librarian Asst.
 Madison Sta. El.
 Madison, MS


         Flexible scheduling


 My opinion---just mine.  Please do not print with my name.

 Flexible scheduling is an ideal in elementary school.  However, its success
 depends on the size of the library, the size of the campus, the number of
 staff members to handle everything, freedom given to students to come to the
 library on their own (some campuses do not allow young children to roam
 alone), automation, support of principal and staff.

 I have played around with it for 10 years in an elementary school.
 Generally speaking, it is not well-received by teachers.  I also never had a
 library big enough to accomodate flexible access for check-out and research
 at the same time as a lesson or story was happening.  Flexible scheduling is
 sort of like whole language.

 I really think elementary students need structured lessons in library use.
 It is very difficult to be sure that you have covered all of the skills with
 every class with flexible scheduling.  I do think flexible access for
 check-out and small group research is essential, though.  I also believe
 that skills are best taught at the point of need.  Depending on staffing and
 school size, though, whether flex or fixed, it is often impossible to see
 all classes once a week (as teachers would like) and provide any time for
 administrative activities, collaborative planning, etc.

 My best schedules were a combination of flex and fixed.  PreK came to the
 library once a week for a story.  K came to the library once a week for a
 story, some skills, and later on, check-out combined with some skills or
 story.  1st came to the library once a week for the same, but started
 checking out in the first few weeks of school, after a review of
 responsibilities and procedures.  2nd through 5th were on a fixed schedule
 every other week for 45 minutes each time.  Skills were combined with
 curricular objectives or whatever they were studying at the time (as were K
 and 1st whenever possible) and they could check out books.

 That left me with 3 open check-out periods each day---30 minutes before
 scheduled library classes, for about 45 minutes around lunch periods, when
 my assistant was not available to me, and 30 minutes at the end of the
 school day.  In addition, I had Fridays unscheduled, and available for
 flexible scheduling with a class or even an entire grade level, to come and
 spend as much time as we deemed necessary for a project.  Also, it gave me
 Fridays as a whole day for outside speakers/readers/programs for the whole
 school, when I didn't have to change any other schedules around.  At various
 times, depending on the size of the student body, I sometimes had a couple
 of hours in a block on another day, to do the same.  And to tend to
 administrative tasks, computer troubleshooting, etc.

 Not every teacher was with happy with the every other week aspect---but
 there weren't enough hours in a week to see every class once a week anyway!
 Many saw the advantages of having a day they could schedule when they needed
 something extra.  I felt comfortable in that I was sure I got in some of the
 necessary skills.  Since my scheduling came after the scheduling of
 PE/music/ fixed reading times, I was able to have a set time each day for
 each grade level (not the ideal for me--that meant I saw 4 or 5 grades in a
 day).

 So, my opinion for elementary school is that we need a combination of flex
 and fixed scheduling that allows for teaching a sequence of library skills
 to everyone, and allows times for independent research and book check-out.

 Sharon Gonzalez
 Librarian
 Connell Middle School
 San Antonio, TX
 sgonzalez3@satx.rr.com
 sgonzalez@saisd.net


 Subject:
         Re: Target: Flexible vs. Fixed Scheduling in Elementary Schools


 I've done a fixed schedule where teachers could stay and participate in
 lessons, a flexible schedule with teacher collaboration and participation
 and a fixed schedule that provided planning time for teachers.  While the
 fixed schedules can be made to work, the flexible schedule definitely works.
 If you use a fixed schedule with teachers - you can plan and co-teach, you
 can integrate skills but not always at just the right time, you do get to
 see all children in equal doses.  If you use a fixed, prep-time type
 schedule you can plan but not co-teach.  It is much harder to integrate
 skills at the right time and right level.  You have very little if any
 flexibility to work with varying levels of learning or in having kids return
 another day to finish work - everything is blocked in by the schedule.  With
 a flexible schedule, you can plan ahead and have the teacher as a partner.
 You can each work with smaller groups of kids.  Kids can return to the
 library several days in a row or go back to the classroom as they finish
 work in the library.  You can connect skills and lessons with classroom
 units at just the right time and complete big research and literature
 projects.  So, I vote for flexible but can make fixed with teachers work.  I
 am very much against providing prep time - information skills are tools not
 a stand-alone curriculum like PE and art and music.  If uniform checkout is
 a concern, you can always have short, scheduled checkout times, especially
 if you have an aide or volunteer help.  If uniform class time is the big
 issue, then teachers will have to understand the need to schedule you and
 your resources - and the principal will need to back you.
 Judy Smith
 Media Specialist
 Vandergriff Elementary
 Fayetteville, AR 72703
 501.521.2850



 Subject:
         RE: Target: Flexible vs. Fixed Scheduling in Elementary Schools


 The teachers at my school would never stand for a straight fixed, or a
 straight flexible schedule, so we do both.  We're a K-6 school and here's
 how we do it:  Mornings we have a fixed schedule - one week primary classes
 are scheduled, the next week it's the upper grades turn. After lunch, it's a
 flexible schedule.  Our school is really pushing Accelerated Reader, so in
 the afternoons each teacher can send two to three kids whenever he/she wants
 to to get another book.  Teachers may also send kids for research, etc.  It
 seems to work out really well.  Of course, at first some of the teachers
 didn't want to come only every other week.  They gave me the old, "My
 students are going to be so sad they can't see you every week!"  To which I
 responded, "What are you, nuts??  You're students can see me every day.
 You, however, will only see me once a week!"  Heaven forbid they actually
 have to teach for another 30 minutes every other week!!!

 Good luck with whatever you decide.
 Lisa Jessup
 Library Clerk
 Pendleton Elementary School
 Buena Park, CA
 LJessup@bpsd.k12.ca.us


 Subject:
         RE: Target: Flexible vs. Fixed Scheduling in Elementary Schools


 I like the fixed/flex schedule.  I have classes for set periods of time, but
 the center is always open for walk-ins.  The fixed part gives me the
 opportunity to formally teach media skills to ALL students, not just those
 that visit the Center frequently. A fixed/flex schedule also allows for
 meeting with classes to work on special projects.  We have a very active
 Media Center, and I think part of the reason for that is because the
 students feel comfortable knowing how to use it.
 I hope you'll post a hit, I'd love to see the responses you get.
 Norma Gregory
 Friendship Elementary
 Deltona, Fl
 norbud@cfl.rr.com


From: STIRKK@annunciationacademy.org on 03/25/2002 09:25
 PM GMT


   Address Information
 Subject:
         Re: Target: Flexible vs. Fixed Scheduling in Elementary Schools


 After 16 years I can say the theory is great :) but it doesn't work in
 practice :))))

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=
All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law.
To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST, etc.) send email to:
listserv@listserv.syr.edu   In the message write EITHER:
1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST
4) SET LM_NET MAIL  * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv.
For LM_NET Help see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/
Archives: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.shtml
 See also EL-Announce for announcements from library media vendors:
    http://www.mindspring.com/~el-announce/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=


LM_NET Mailing List Home