Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
It is THAT time of year again. Term papers are due, and teachers are coming to me two or three a day. They have done their best to track down plagiarism in a number of assignments, but they still have reservations about a handful more, can I help? Sometimes. I have just had a borderline plagiarism case referred to me. The student had named one of his sources fairly early on, but the paper arguably showed a over-dependence on that single source. There appeared to be some paraphrasing of the original text, though only two sentences stood out as word-for-word lifting with no quotation marks. I could find no plagiarism in the rest of the paper – about 66% of the essay. (This of course does not mean there is no plagiarism, only that none was found). Indeed, the larger part of the paper was looking into the future, speculating on likely developments. It was the sections which dealt with historical aspects which were taken, directly or indirectly, from the cited source. To make it even more marginal, the student had used those lifts and paraphrases to build his own case – it was not a matter of blind and thoughtless lifting. For better or worse, the teacher and I agreed that we needed to speak with the student, demonstrate where and how and why he had gone wrong, and drop him a grade. We felt there was no intent to deceive, and that the student should be penalized for sloppy technique rather than punished for plagiarism. We have cases enough where the plagiarism is blatant and the student all too aware of what s/he was doing and hoping to hide, and this paper did not deserve the same treatment. Now the dilemma: I found the original, cited, document easily enough; there was no attempt to hide it or to deceive. It was part of a personal web site, a chapter from a well-reviewed and authoritative published book which is currently out of print – but the second edition of which which will be published later this year: the web site gave further information about the book and further samples of its contents. The trouble is, I found two other web sites which used this chapter, and they used it in full. What was missing from these two sites was the name of the original author and any linkage to the site or to the book. The intention in both cases appeared to be to claim the work as original. Further twists: one URL is that of a high school in the States, and the work is probably the personal page of a student at that school. The second URL leads to a College of Education; this posting of the unattributed material appears to have been posted by a student teacher. In year 2000. [There is even a third posting on the web, a doctoral thesis which uses just two paragraphs from the original work, but it is direct lifting, without quotation marks and without attribution – which in my book equals plagiarism (and may suggest further investigation of the rest of the paper would not be amiss).] So the question is, is it my responsibility to blow the whistle? If the high school teacher, the school of education tutor, the doctoral panel, did not discover plagiarism, should I put this in their minds? Is it my duty to tell the author of the original book/ web site that his work appears to have been mis-used? In this particular case, because the original site is a come-on for the book, it is not just a case of “simple” plagiarism; the breach of copyright could be held to affect sales of the book, and thus punitive damages might be sought against the plagiarists. I think I know the answer to my question – but it would be assuring to hear what colleagues and peers have to say. What would YOU do? What DO you do? John Royce Library Director : Robert College of Istanbul TR-80820 Arnavutköy - Istanbul Turkey =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST, etc.) send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv. For LM_NET Help see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archives: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.shtml See also EL-Announce for announcements from library media vendors: http://www.mindspring.com/~el-announce/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=