Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Thanks to all those who reposnded - this is the 2nd posting of information. Here are the questions I asked: Please let me know if you are using either of these programs strictly to reward students for reading or are there grading scales in place to give students grades? Do you have any policies that will not allow a child to fail just because he/she does not get enough points or pass enough books for a grading period. If you use a grading scale or point scale, please send it to me. Please be sure to let me know the grade level. Do you only allow students to read books just on their lexile level or reading level? Thanks Paula Our school uses Reading Counts and for the most part, it is strictly voluntary. The students are rewarded with trophies when they reach a certain number of points or books. First grade uses number of books, but 2-5 use number of points in order to encourage students to read longer, more difficult books. In 3-5, students are restricted to books above a certain grade reading level. I don't think any of the teachers bother with lexiles. A couple of the teachers require a Reading Counts book each week in 1st and 2nd grades, but it is primarily voluntary and our parents are big supporters of the program. By far the most active participants are 1st and 2nd graders. We've just started Reading Counts and are using it as incentive only. The kids are VERY excited! I have always advocated that AR is to be used as a tool to assist teachers in getting students to read. It should never be used as part of the grading process. It can be used as an indicator in parent/teacher conferences. Also, students should be encouraged to read books on their level because it will bring about success and if properly monitored that level will increase but if they want to go off level then let them. If you maintain the database students can only take a test once, and will eventually run out of books that are too easy for them We use Reading Counts soley as a reading incentive program--no grades, no restrictions on what the students read. We use it as reward and some teachers give grades. The ones who use 20 questions count 5 pts for each question. If the person lets the students test twice, she averages the two scores. Another just makes 92 ("B") the highest grade they can receive. A few who use just 10 questions give 3 chances to pass. If you pass the first time you get an "A" 10 = 100 9 = 98 8 = 96 7 = 94 Second try gets a "B" Third try gets a "C". If they don't pass on the 3rd try they get the highest failing score they earned. 60, 50, etc. I have one teacher who uses 15 questions. I don't know her scale. we use the Reading Counts program at FDHS. The individual teachers decide how they are going to use the program (Lexile score, Reading Level, Points), How they are going to count it, and what the consequences are? The testing is done in the computer lab. The media center buys the books and quizzes and helps students select books. I don't know about Reading Counts but in the Reading Renaissance training for AR, they STRONGLY recommend that grades are NOT assigned to AR performance. That just adds one more thing for kids to dread and that is the last thing you want! The purpose of AR is to increase reading comprehension. If their reading comprehension improves, that will help in the work that is graded. I have seen schools disregard the recommendation and grade AR work anyway - the students there (middle school students that attended our elementary school) now tell me they no longer enjoy reading. Good luck! Our district policy statement on the use of AR states that no negative grades will be given in conjunction with the use of AR. We do allow for AR to be used in conjunction with grades if they are a positive such as extra credit. The thinking behind this is that AR (or Reading Counts as I understand) are not reading programs in and of themselves, but merely tools that are used in conjunction with literacy models adopted by our district. We use AR as a motivation tool. We have a Reading Wall of Fame and students' names are posted as they accumulate points. Students names are announced on our weekly TV show as they move from one level to the next. Students with about a 100 word vocabulary are allowed to begin the AR program, which means we have many 1st graders participating currently. Kindergartener teachers sometimes take a test as a class using the teacher's name. Individual kindergarteners do not take tests. We are a CD -5th grade school. Although a teacher may occasionally use an AR test as a grade there is no over all grading based on AR. Different teachers use AR differently. Most teachers set a certain reading goal, weekly or monthly. They often reward students who meet the goal and their are consequences for students who do not meet the goal. We encourage teachers to provide alternatives for students who read books for which we do not have AR tests. In reality, most students would rather read a book that has an AR test than do a book report. Some teachers require projects in addition to AR tests, old-fashioned things like mobiles, dioramas, tri-fold displays, etc. Several of our teachers purchase tests for books in their classroom libraries that are not in the school media center. I coordinate orders and at $2.58 a piece tests are affordable for teachers. We also write many AR tests ourselves so that we are not limited to tests provided by Renaissance Learning. In fact, currently we have filled the slots built in to the program for tests made in-house and we are petitioning Rennaisance Learning for an expansion. They are not being cooperative so far but we believe they will come around. We use the STAR test and students have a reading range. They are encourage to take tests in their reading range. We have some generic, broad blocks in place, but we routinely use the password to override these blocks based on teacher or media specialist judgement. For example, many of our teachers require students to read many non-fiction books the third nine weeks. They believe that many PACT reading questions are on non-fiction passages and that reading non-fiction boosts students' comprehension. AR states that non-ficiton books reading levels are probably about one grade level above the stated book level, so we bypass the blocks frequently during the third nine weeks. Our teachers actively monitor their students progress in AR and intervene when students are not experiencing success. We work towards the goal Renaissance Learning sets of less than 10% of a class listed as At-Risk. I believe that each teacher having access to her classes' data is essential if AR is used to be used as an effective tool. This means teachers need an AR Teacher icon on their desktops and should not have to rely solely on reports printed out in the media center. Since we use AR as a tool, we encourge students to bring the book with them to take the test. Just as we want students to reread a passage on the PACT test to locate the answer, we encourage students to reread a passage when taking an AR test. Time does not permit them to look up every answer on a routine basis and if we suspect that a student has not read the book first we intervene. We do not have mega prizes or parties based on AR points. Although not exactly intrinsic we hope that pride in a job well done is the main reward our students receive from participating in our AR program. strictly a motivational program. Students can read at or above their reading level. Below their level with special permission from the teacher or librarian. Our 7th and 8th grade language arts teachers require the students to use Reading Counts to determine one of their grades (averaged into their class grade). The need to have earned 20 points per quarter to earn an A and the teachers have a scale as to how many points for a B, etc. (sorry I can't get that info. for you--I'm in a different building) They also average in the % correct score so if kids are not passing quizzes, it will hurt their grade. At the high school level, we use AR points for a grade. Right now, the points are equal to a daily assignment in the grade book. For example, if a student completes 80% of their goal, then they will receive 80% or a "B" for that daily assignment. Yes, the students have figured it out that they can still pass the class if they don't participate in AR so....next year, we are looking at making AR points worth a test grade. By making it a test grade, it will be weighted 20% of the total grade. One teacher is trying this system out this semester and it seems to be working better. If you have any other ideas, please let me know. This is our second year implementing AR (grades 9-11) at the high school level. Our focus has changed, but we used to grade on points for AR. Each child had a set number of points to get based on their reading level with a maximum number for those who read above grade level (2 or more years above grade level). Students who wanted to read above their grade level had to have a log to turn in and we recommended that they read it with someone (parent, older brother or sister). If they wanted to go below their target range, they had to read it to someone younger. Both took a parent signature. Only one mom complained - her son was notorious for wasting time in class and didn't want to read books. She thought we were being totally uinreasonable to require him to read books at home! (He read magazines and comics for 1/2 hour every evening) Most teachers use them as supplemental reading. One 5th grader teacher used them as "extra credit" points. A third grade teacher used them as a part of her reading assessment, using their progress as an assessment tool. We are in a high school. 1. There is a drawing once a six weeks for a gift certificate to Barnes and Noble. Students read for class assignments, but it is strictly - pass the quiz, get a 100 for reading the book. Then many of them do extension work with the books. 2. Never came up. 3. I have repointed many books - allowing the # of grade level reading X the number of pages/100. (e.g.. 9th grade reading level book that is about 200 pages is 9 X 200/100 = 18. Make sense? Of course, I take into account the Lexile level, the amount of print on a page, etc. When I used the program in an elementary school, I used the same formula but divided by 32 (the size of most picture books). 4. Never, never, never restrict what they can read, within their teacher's assignment. We use reading counts in our school as a voluntary program to encourage reading for fun. Students select the books on their own, and they can read any books they choose. Books are labeled, but are mixed with regular books on the shelves. We have incentive prizes for different point categories. Prizes are displayed on the prize wall. They get their first prize, which is a pencil or topper, at 6 points, and another at 12. Then they earn an additional prize for every 25 points. We don't bother with taking points away, just let them accumulate and the kids collect prizes as different point categories. Again, the program is strictly voluntary, although our teachers support it by making time for the kids to take tests during the day. About 50% of our students participate voluntarily to the point of earning at least one prize, and we have students as early as first grade who have had some success with it. Hope this helps, All of our teachers in grades 4-12 give our AR tests a grade. In the lower grades they must earn so many points. This is part of their reading grade. In our upper grades their percentage the receive on their monthly required tests are a portion of their reading grade. ===== Paula Yohe Director Of Technology/Library Media Center Dillon School District Two 405 West Washington Street Dillon, SC 29536 Phone: 843-841-3604 Fax:843-774-1214 paula_yohe@yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more http://tax.yahoo.com =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=- All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. LM_NET Help & Information: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archive: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.shtml LM_NET Select/EL-Announce: http://www.cuenet.com/archive/el-announce/ LM_NET Supporters: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ven.html =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-