TARGET: Folletbound vs Permabound

[Christine Zafonte <czafonte@OPTONLINE.NET>]

I thought I would tap the collective knowledge of this group for in ourder
to get a better understanding of the differences between these two bindings.
I currently order only from Follett, just for simplicity sake, but have been
increasingly dissatisfied with the way they hold up.  The other day I
recieved some samples from Permabound, and they look just like Folletbound.
Does anyone have experience with both of these products?  Which one holds up
better? Which costs more (and is it worth that amount more)?  Any input
would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks in advance.  I will post a HIT if
there is interest.

Christine Zafonte
LMS Signal Hill Elem.
Dix Hills, NY
sendto:czafonte@optonline.net

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-
All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law.
To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu
In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET  2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL
3) SET LM_NET MAIL  4) SET LM_NET DIGEST  * Allow for confirmation.
LM_NET Help & Information: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/
Archive: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.shtml
LM_NET Select/EL-Announce: http://www.cuenet.com/archive/el-announce/
LM_NET Supporters: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ven.html
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-