Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Judging from the SF Chronicle article reproduced at http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0512-01.htm (as posted here earlier), there is a real issue regarding changes in limits on media outlets -- one that has received many public comments -- but the email message posted on this list to kick off this discussion greatly misstates (exaggerates) the content and potential impact of the proposal. It is NOT proposed that one entity could own NBC and ABC and CBS and other networks. http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/ may be helpful to those who wish to look into the real proposal. See esp. http://www.fcc.gov/commissioners/powell/chairmans_response/. According to the latter, a letter to Congress from Chairmal Michael K. Powell, some 18,000 comments were offered on the proposal, of which 17,000 were from individual Americans. Quoting in part: "As several of the letters recognize, the Commission has complied the most extensive record ever for a biennial review. It is a record of over 18,000 comments (with over 17,000 coming from individual Americans), compiled over an extended comment period. It is a record consisting of twelve empirical studies of various aspects of the media marketplace that were separately made available to the public for comment, as were the underlying data that supported those studies conclusions. It is a record that has significant input from the American public through individual comments, through public hearings and through the unprecedented Commission action of reaching out and asking the public how they use the media to access news, and public affairs information. This Commission can proudly say that it has conducted the most thorough and comprehensive review of our broadcast ownership rules in their sixty year history. The Commission has spent the past several months studying this record and the time to make judgments based on that record is before us." I express no opinion on the proposal or on Mr. Powell's comments, but simply provide the above as more authoritative than an Internet chain letter. Ken ---------------------------------------------------- Kenneth W. Umbach, Ph.D. Research-Writing-Editing-Consulting Ken@umbachconsulting.com http://www.umbachconsulting.com 6966 Sunrise Blvd., #263 Citrus Heights, CA 95610 916-733-2159 -- voice ---------------------------------------------------- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=- All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. LM_NET Help & Information: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archive: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.shtml LM_NET Select/EL-Announce: http://www.cuenet.com/archive/el-announce/ LM_NET Supporters: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ven.html =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-