Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I always enjoy the passion with which librarians respond to reading issues, and lexiles are no exception. I hope that this posting will inject what my library director calls "the calm voice of sanity" into the discussion. First of all, lexiles are neither good nor bad, but can be either depending on how they are used within the school and the library. In my years I have discovered that a bad tool can be good for some kids and a good tool can be bad for some kids. It's the indiscriminate use of any tool that is a problem. The key here is balance--using the tool to facilitate whatever we are trying to accomplish and not using the tool when it would deter the higher accomplishments of students who don't need the tool at all. And it is part of our job to help those educators without such a balanced view to learn it from us. Second, lexiles provide accountability. We are living at a time when public school accountability is increasingly important, not only for funding but perhaps even for keeping our jobs. Using reading lexiles or any other reading program can be a useful way to provide data to those who require it. It is for that reason that I like having lexiles entered into MARC records. Is lexile-based reading an authentic assessment? Maybe not, but then I've seen my share of ridiculous assessment vehicles that have been accepted throughout public education for many decades. Again it is balance--providing a basis for accountability where necessary without letting it interfere with what we educators know to be sound educational practices. A third point about lexiles is their contribution to time management. In a school library where throughout the day, classes of 30 or more kids are brought in for 15-20 minutes to check out a book to read, having a tool such as lexiles (or AR, etc) pasted on the spine can put a readable book into the hands of most students during that time frame, allowing the librarian to serve the needs of those students for whom such tools are not appropriate. For older students we can supply lists of books at the specified level, rather than marking books. And we can still use incidental visits to work with individual students and move them beyond reliance on just one number/star/whatever on the spine of a book or on a list. Too, we must remember that teachers are under enormous pressures regarding standardized tests, proscribed curriculums, and accountabilty. Many are required to give standardized reading tests and then to document that their students are reading appropriate materials. Whenever you feel impatient with a teacher, think about going back to the classroom yourself. Once you've shuddered at the thought, think about how you can best serve your teachers within the parameters of your school's requirements and yet accomplish your own lofty goals for your library reading program. If lexiles or AR or any similar program can accomplish either one, why not use it? We are fortunate to have such a short cut. Finally, about our discussions. If we want everyone to feel free to share their successes and their frustrations, we must be gentle with each other. We can always find groups to chastise and berate us, so we need not compound our professional frustrations with the whip of each others' tongues. I know I have often been guilty of this myself, so I try hard now to not jump to conclusions, and to ask clarifying questions. I try to be sure that what I write about someone else is something I'd not mind others reading about me. And I use personal email instead of group postings if I need to offer a critique that might be embarrassing. Barbara Paciotti, SLMIS Barbara Bush MS, Irving TX barupa@swbell.net -------------------------------------------------------------------- All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/el-announce/ LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------