Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
"We need to keep in mind that ....we should try to select material and recommend it on its merits and not its bias." Which is a major part of selection v. censoring. A good reminder to all of us. Last week I was working on next year's book orders and was noting that there seems to be some dearth of materials to really choose from in some categories. Take a look at the offerings in military information; It seems that much of the 'What Life in the ...' or ' About the F-xx Jet, Helicopter, truck', 'Careers in the branch' books tend to be lower reading level and labeled 'high interest'. However, books that cover military issues in ancient and modern civ tend to more on grade level for curriculum. In other words, books with lower RL tend to promote militarism, while on-level books tend to discuss the social implications. Or, Howard Zinn isn't in the Hi/Lo category, nor much that delves more deeply into military as a career, technology of equipment, etc for higher readers. This weekend I was working on a post for my Librarian in the Middle blog about Peace Education and Anti-war bibs and was realizing that trying to balance a collection in those topic areas would be difficult. Robert Eiffert, Librarian | beiffert@egreen.wednet.edu Pacific MS Vancouver, WA | http://pac.egreen.wednet.edu/library Librarian in the Middle blog at www.beiffert.net | robert@beiffert.net C B Seale wrote: I would also have to agree that we need to balance the material in the library. But I also have another question regarding this web site. Being a long time member of the left wing of the liberal side of the Democratic party, I would question the bias of this website. In looking at the sources, most of the support, if not all, does definitely fit into the same category. We need to keep in mind that just because we (I in this case) am a card carrying liberal, we should try to select material and recommend it on its merits and not its bias. Even I am willing to look at the other side and when teaching English required students to write a paper on something they had a firm belief in and then the next assignment was to take the other side. None liked the second assignment, but most did look at the other side and find some validity. -- Robert Eiffert, Librarian | beiffert@egreen.wednet.edu Pacific MS Vancouver, WA | http://pac.egreen.wednet.edu/library Librarian in the Middle blog at www.beiffert.net | robert@beiffert.net -------------------------------------------------------------------- All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------