Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Can anyone please point me to some reliable, substantiated data about 1. The proportion of data that we take in through our eyes (eg 90% visual, 5% audial or whatever) 2. The proportion of visual learners to audial or kinaesthetic. I want to back up some statements I am making with some real research, and although I have done a Google search and looked at many pages, I can't get data that I can verify. I thought I found what I wanted, only to be warned that the graph was not "based on any reliable data". Any help gratefully received, as always. Barbara Barbara Braxton Teacher-Librarian Palmerston District Primary School PALMERSTON ACT 2913 AUSTRALIA T. 61 2 6205 6162 F. 61 2 6205 7242 W. http://www.palmdps.act.edu.au E. barbara@iimetro.com.au Together, we learn from each other. -------------------------------------------------------------------- All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------