Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
What a wonderful site. Many, many thanks to all who responded! Most remarkably, a former school parent of mine responded. I knew he was working on his MLS but hadn't heard about his present job. What a small world! This is a compilation of the responses I received to my question about standards (especially NC) for the average age of different parts of the collection. Many suggested Follett's Titlewave for assistance in determining holes in the collection and for suggestions in weeding. The standards suggested mostly come from publishers. I did get one suggestion for further research for me to do to find out state standards and where I should search. Many, many thanks for all those who replied. These guidelines will help in the grant proposal. Average collection age I teach in NYC. We were told that S.S. and Science need to be updated every 5 years, as they're the ones that have the most changes. Everything else is ok to stay 10 years, with replacements as necessary. That's what we're told. Whether everyone does it is another story.... Here's a link that might help, look at the CREW GUIDELINES BY DEWEY CLASS http://www.tsl.state.tx.us/ld/pubs/crew/guidelines.html#guidelinesforweeding I would think different Dewey numbers would demand different standards. I am working on the update to the Wilson Middle School catalog and we look carefully at anything older than 2000. I would think you could make a good case by looking at certain numbers, cloning, environmental concerns, astronomy. I uploaded my collections files to Mackin (www.mackin.com) and they ran a report detailing the holes in my collection as well as areas that were outdated. It tells in the report they were comparing it to a "Blue Ribbon" something. You may go to their web site and see if it can give you some more information. From the MSLMA.org standards page (http://www.mslma.org/whoweare/standards/standardsrev.html), in Massachusetts, the recommendation is for 70% of the total collection published within the last 10 years. I have also had great success with anecdotal evidence, such as showing the set of encyclopedias we had on our shelves in which the periodical table was much so much less populated than those you'd find published currently because many of the elements hadn't been discovered yet! Good luck! Grant writing is grueling work! According to Follett Titlewise collection development program (available free online), the average age of the collections in each age sensitive Dewey decimal range should be: Years 003-007 Systems/Computer programs 3 320-329 Political Science 5 361-369 Social Problems and Services 5 370-379 Education 5 380-389 Commerce, Communications and Transportation 5 520-529 Astronomy and Allied Sciences 5 570-579 Life Sciences/Medicine 5 910-919 Geography, Maps, Atlases 5 If you are automated you can export your data and then upload to Follett's Titlewise for a collection analysis. One of the things they do is 'age' the collection and give suggestions for weeding. Don't know if this is what you want but it might help. This table was from Follett: Dewey Ranges Acceptable Age (Years) 003-007 Systems Data/Computer Programs 3 320-329 Political Science 5 361-369 Social Problems and Services 5 370-379 Education 5 380-389 Commerce, Communications and Transportation 5 520-529 Astronomy and Allied Sciences 5 570-579 Life Sciences/Biology 5 610-619 Medical Sciences/Medicine 5 910-919 Geography, Maps, Atlases 5 I'd love to know what you find out about this topic! On Friday, my superintendent came to me needing some of this same information. We are on Spring Break this next week, so I am browsing for information to present to him when we get back. One thing I discovered is that our Circ. system (Athena) doesn't give the average age of the collection. When I contacted their tech. support, I discovered that they have a program called Benchmark that will give reports that I need. There is a free trial at http://sagebrushcorp.com This site compares the collection with a standard. I am currently looking through the site for more information to determine where these standards came from. Maybe this can help you too Robin Chandler Media Coordinator Immaculata School Hendersonville, NC rchandler@immac.org -------------------------------------------------------------------- All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/el-announce/ LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------