Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I have been working on issues of cyberbullying and cyberthreats and have discovered a situation that I believe may present significant danger to the well-being of students and staff in our schools. I have exercised due diligence in investigating this issue and do not think I am overstating the concern. Fact 1. Several school shooters posted material on the Internet prior to the school shootings that demonstrated their distressed emotional state and that if reported and reviewed in the context of a comprehensive threat analysis would have likely resulted in an assessment of high concern and action. This includes Eric Harris http://www.thedailycamera.com/shooting/11ashot.html and Jeff Weise http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2005/03/25_bensonl_weise3/. Fact 2. Students are actively posting material online due to the emergence social networking sites that provide easy-to-use posting and communications tools. Some of these postings should be of concern to schools -- including direct threats, threatening language, statements indicating significant emotional distress, cyberbullying, suicidal intentions, hate group or gang activity, and the like. However, it is important to understand that what first might appear to be an online threat could range from a joke to a legitimate imminent threat of violence. Also, students are impersonating other students for purpose of causing trouble to those students. Comprehensive analysis of the situation is imperative. Do a Google search on the terms "MySpace, school, threat" and you will see some news reports on this concern. In most cases, other students will have witnessed concerning online material. Students and parents should be encouraged to report concerning online material to safe school personnel. Fact 3. But if a parent or a student reports to safe school personnel the presence of concerning material on the Internet, IN MANY SCHOOLS IT IS PROBABLE THAT THE SAFE SCHOOL OFFICIAL WILL NOT BE ABLE TO IMMEDIATELY REVIEW THE ONLINE MATERIAL TO DETERMINE THE LEGITIMACY AND EXTENT OF CONCERN BECAUSE HE OR SHE WILL BE BLOCKED FROM DOING SO BY THE SCHOOL'S INTERNET FILTERING SYSTEM! The inability, and perhaps lack of expertise, to rapidly conduct a review of concerning online material could have grave consequences. This is a situation that calls for immediate analysis and change of policy and procedure in all schools, where appropriate. Ensuring that all safe school personnel have the authority and capacity to immediately override the school filter is essential! Such a change involves technical considerations and policy authorization. In districts that control their own Internet filtering systems, it should be relatively easy to provide override capabilities to all safe school personnel. In schools where the filtering is managed at a consortium level (regional or state), this capacity may be technically more difficult to implement -- but it MUST be done. Districts may fear that school officials with override authority might engage in inappropriate access. This concern should be dealt with through monitoring and appropriate consequences -- safe school personnel must have immediate override authority. The Children's Internet Protection Act does not prevent the authorization of school officials to override the filter. In fact, the only reason that the US Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of CIPA was the finding that filters could be easily and promptly overridden. (http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/02pdf/02-361.pdf - read the concurring opinions of Justices Kennedy and Bryer -- the two swing votes) If you are a safe school official who currently does not have the authority and capacity to override the school's filter and a report has been made to you about online material that you perceive may be of significant concern and you cannot get immediate assistance from technical personnel to override the filter, my recommendation is that you consult with some Internet savvy students, offer them "immunity from disciplinary action," and ask for their assistance in finding a proxy to circumvent the filter so that you can quickly review the material to determine the degree of potential risk. Most Internet savvy students have no difficulties circumventing the school's Internet filter. This may violate district policy, but could safe the life of a child. It is essential that all school threat assessment and suicide prevention plans be updated to reflect the reality that students are posting material related to these concerns online. Even if a report of concern did not originate online, material could be found online related to such report. Emotional distress of a student may be demonstrated online or the result of harm being inflicted by others to that student online. I have prepared a document that outlines the concerns for educators related to the new online social networking environments and outlines comprehensive actions I recommend school officials take to better address these concerns. This document is on my site at http://cyberbully.org/docs/youthriskonlinealert.pdf. Please feel free to forward this message and the document that is on my web site. I do recognize that in sending this message to all of the individuals I have is waving a major red flag. If my message has the potential of resulting in a change in policies and procedures that results in saving the life of one child, I consider it worth the risk that the recipients of this message might not consider this issue to be as a grave a concern as I do. Nancy -- Nancy Willard, M.S., J.D. Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use http://csriu.org http://cyberbully.org nwillard@csriu.org -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------