Previous by DateNext by Date Date Index
Previous by ThreadNext by Thread Thread Index
LM_NET Archive



Study bolsters public schools
Students on par with private-campus peers; U.S. downplays data



11:55 PM CDT on Friday, July 14, 2006
By DIANA JEAN SCHEMO / The New York Times


WASHINGTON – The Education Department reported Friday that, in reading and 
math, children attending public schools generally do as well as or better 
than children with similar racial, economic and social backgrounds in 
private schools.

The exception was in eighth-grade reading, where the private school children 
did better.

The report, which compared fourth- and eighth-grade reading and math scores 
from nearly 7,000 public schools and more than 530 private schools in 2003, 
also found that conservative Christian schools lagged significantly behind 
public schools when it came to eighth-grade math.

The study, carrying the imprimatur of the National Center for Education 
Statistics, part of the Education Department, was contracted to the 
Educational Testing Service and delivered to the department last year.

It went through a lengthy peer review and includes an extended section of 
caveats about its limitations and calling such a comparison of public and 
private schools "of modest utility."

Its release, on a summer Friday, was made without a news conference or 
comment from Education Secretary Margaret Spellings.

Reg Weaver, president of the National Education Association, the union for 
millions of teachers, said the findings showed that public schools were 
"doing an outstanding job" and that if the results had been favorable to 
private schools, "there would have been press conferences and glowing 
statements about private schools."

"The administration has been giving public schools a beating since the 
beginning" to advance President Bush's political agenda, Mr. Weaver said, of 
promoting charter schools and taxpayer-financed vouchers for private schools 
as alternatives to failing traditional public schools.

A spokesman for the Education Department, Chad Colby, said he did not expect 
the findings to influence policy. Mr. Colby emphasized repeatedly that "an 
overall comparison of the two types of schools is of modest utility."

"We're not just for public schools or private schools," he said. "We're for 
good schools."

The report mirrors and expands on similar findings this year by Christopher 
and Sarah Theule Lubienski, a husband-and-wife team at the University of 
Illinois who examined just math scores.

The new study looked at reading scores, as well.

The study, along with one of charter schools, was commissioned by the former 
head of the National Center for Education Statistics, Robert Lerner, an 
appointee of Mr. Bush, at a time preliminary data suggested that charter 
schools, which are given public money but are run by private groups, were 
doing no better at educating children than traditional public schools.

Proponents of charter schools had said the data did not take into account 
the predominance of children in their schools who had already had problems 
in their neighborhood schools.

The two new studies examined the backgrounds of children in the schools and 
took into account factors such as race, ethnicity, income and parents' 
educational backgrounds to shed light on the test-score comparisons. The 
extended study of charter schools has not been released.

Findings favorable to private schools would probably have given a boost to 
administration efforts to offer children in ailing public schools the option 
of attending private schools. An Education Department official who spoke on 
condition of anonymity because of the climate surrounding the report said 
researchers were "extra cautious" in reviewing the study and were aware of 
the "political sensitivity" of the issue. The official said the section 
warning against drawing unsupported conclusions from data was expanded 
somewhat as the report went through the review process.

The report cautions, for example, against concluding that children do better 
because of the type of school they're in, as opposed to some unknown factors 
that might influence performance. It also warned that there was great 
variation of performance among private schools, making a blanket comparison 
of public and private schools "of modest utility."

The director of reporting and dissemination for the assessment division at 
the National Center for Education Statistics, Arnold Goldstein, said that 
the review process was meticulous but added that was not unusual for the 
agency. He said there was no political pressure to alter the report's 
findings.

The report released Friday examined fourth- and eighth-grade math and 
reading scores for students attending public, private and religious schools. 
Students in private schools typically score higher than those in public 
schools, a finding confirmed in the study. The report then dug deeper to 
compare students of like racial, economic and social backgrounds. When it 
did that, the private-school advantage disappeared in all areas except 
eighth-grade reading.

entire story at

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/071506dnnatschools.1a367f8.html





Mary Croix Ludwick, Librarian  K-5
Thomas Haley Elem, Irving, Texas (near Dallas)
ludwick@swbell.net (home address)

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law.
  You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings
  by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book.
To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu
In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET  2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL
3) SET LM_NET MAIL  4) SET LM_NET DIGEST  * Allow for confirmation.
 * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/
 * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/
 * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/
 * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------


LM_NET Mailing List Home