Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Dear Colleagues, In my hot-off-the-press book, Collaborative Strategies for Teaching Reading Comprehension: Maximizing Your Impact (ALA Editions, 2007), I offer background information and 21 sample lesson plans to support K-6 teacher-librarians in co-teaching standards-based reading comprehension - information literacy lessons. During my 12-tenure as an elementary and high school teacher-librarian, I recognized that teaching reading comprehension strategies was foundational for teaching information literacy skills. * Students cannot evaluate information unless they can first comprehend it. * Students cannot meet new information successfully unless they assess and access or build their background knowledge. * They cannot interact with texts unless they know how to ask relevant questions and how to find the answers to their questions within texts. * They cannot make effective notes or summarize if they cannot identify main ideas and supporting details. * Students cannot synthesize information and transform it into knowledge unless they know how to draw information from several sources, interpret information and make inferences, and evaluate it. Each of the reading comprehension lessons in my book is designed for classroom teachers and teacher-librarians to co-teach classroom content standards alongside information literacy standards. Each interdisciplinary lesson lists ALL of these standards and through the lesson implementation SHOWS how these standards are interdependent. When I was a practicing teacher-librarian, I published two collaboratively planned and taught lessons on the ReadWriteThink.org Web site: Elementary: Peace Poems and Picasso Doves: Literature, Art, Technology, and Poetry. (2003): www.readwritethink.org/lessons/lesson_view.asp?id=93 High School: Behind the Masks: Exploring Culture and Self through Art and Poetry. (2004): http://www.readwritethink.org/lessons/lesson_view.asp?id=395 I have a bio page that speaks to the benefits of classroom-library collaboration on RWT.org (a joint project of the International Reading Association/National Council of Teachers of English/Verizon Foundation): http://www.readwritethink.org/lessons/author_detail.asp?authorid=67 <http://www.readwritethink.org/lessons/author_detail.asp?authorid=67&lessoni d=395> &lessonid=395 Yes, information literacy standards must use the language of the classroom content area standards. (The people who spoke at the Standards Forum at ALA Midwinter seemed to be in universal agreement on this point.) In addition, teacher-librarians must increase our proficiency at finding the areas where "our" standards intersect with "their" standards. In fact, I believe all educators would greatly benefit by following ONE set of standards. Clearly, I am not in charge of the world. Best, Judi Judi Moreillon, M.L.S., Ph.D. Literacies and Libraries Consultant Author: <http://tinyurl.com/yzvy5g> Collaborative Strategies for Teaching Reading Comprehension: Maximizing Your Impact <http://storytrail.com/> http://storytrail.com -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------