Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
My opinion of this book...and how controversial it is... (and will try not to spoil the ending for those who have not read it yet.) I was not sure that the topic of 12-step program was appropriate for 8-9 year olds. Yes, it is in their lives, but that is not what kids of this age are interested in reading. The age range is touted to be 9-12----but the illustrations are geared for younger, and the main character is 10, which will also gear it younger. Scrotum is not that major of a concern. It is there, and in and of itself, not that shocking of a word. Not a word that is in everyday conversation, but I don't have that major of a problem. If that WAS the only issue, then this book would not be controversial. For students of 8-9 year olds, maybe not the best choice, but if the students watch any late night tv, they will hear worse. The parents of my schools would probably be upset with the book, since I am in a very conservative area, but after the hubdub quiets down, I would expect to have the same parents upset with the HPs, or Blume, or other books that have been known to be slightly controversial also. I don't expect this book to go to the point of being banned. I am more concern with the social issues of 12-step programs--alcohol, gambling, smoking, drugs, which are a major part of the plot. Also the fact that the major worry of the main character is that since her mother's death that she will be placed in a orphanage, and decides the running away into the desert is her only option. Father is not involved, and asks his ex to come from France to take care of the girl, and SHE wants to go back to France after 2-years of being her guardian. I do like that the book does come to a decent ending, but does not completely resolve the issues. The 10-year-old main character, is written well. All of the rest of the characters in this book fail to meet the same quality. There is rarely someone comforting or offering grown up advice for her fears. I heard one reviewer state that it was a town "who spoke the truth". It seem more of a town completely obsessed with their own miseries. I feel that this might be a good book for families to read together and talk about. But I do not feel that for 8-10 year olds, that this is a book that they would read on their own. For the most part, they are NOT into realistic, social issue fiction. They are more into: Goosebumps (don't get me started on this one), Magic Treehouse series, Animal Ark, Animorphs, Unfortunate events, and books beginning to get into fantasy (HPs and Inkheart, etc). If the author had written this for an audience of 11-14 year olds, she would have been at the correct targeted age for the topic and how she deals with the topic. The topic, and the way that the author deals with the social issues, just does not mix with the targeted audience. I know that the Newbery's frequently are books that are ones that deal with issues (especially lately), and leave the reader to ponder deeper into the book, or the writing. Somehow the committee missed on this one. I do not feel that this book represents the BEST WRITING and WORTHY of recognition above all other books written last year. That being said, now, I will decide whether to purchase this book for my 2 elementary libraries based on whether it will add to my collection and whether or not to justify purchasing a $17 book out of my $2000 budget for all books and video and supplies. That is the true hard facts of the controversy....most librarians will have a hard time justifying the purchase of a book that will for the most part just sit on the shelf, because it is targeted for a reading age that is not the interest reading level of that age. And the age THAT would pick it up, will not want to be seen with a book that looks "babyish". My 2 cents--and not worth too much--opinion and review of this book. But withholding whether I decide to purchase this book or not out of my next year's budget (this year's budget having been long spent). I have enjoyed that the word is what caught the controversy first, the plot is what will keep it a controversial book. And if the New York Times wants to do a REAL front page article....How about one on how libraries (both public, school, and private) are continuing to how to figure out how to fund with decreasing funds and decreasing staff? And still having to have programs that are engaging and reaching patrons that are turning more to video and audio. Or to research the trends on the YA and elementary books, and the quality of writing. Okay, off my high horse, and back to the real world. JaKay Greer Teacher-Librarian McBride Elementary (K-2) Columbia City School (6th) jakayg@sthelens.k12.or.us -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------
AdmID:29D2BE27E8BFB9AA49D6D6FAB033486D -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------