Previous by DateNext by Date Date Index
Previous by ThreadNext by Thread Thread Index
LM_NET Archive



First let me say that I think this is a fabulous discussion.

The whole censorship vs selection thing is truly a slippery slope  
IMO. There's a pretty fine line between "I won't buy this book  
because it has a word (a topic, a concept) that I think is  
inappropriate or because parents will complain" and "I won't buy this  
book because it doesn't suit my readers/my collection." It's a  
concept I've always struggled with - the fact is, banning a book from  
a library (in an official sense) has never prevented a reader from  
getting the book elsewhere, so I think it's hard to use availability  
elsewhere as rationale for not calling it censorship. It's a personal  
decision that we make in a professional and very public manner - one  
person's logical decision is another person's censorship.

For my part I've already bought the book, which I might not have done  
without the controversy (I don't necessarily buy every Newbery) - I  
plan to use it as a springboard for discussion with my students who  
are convinced that book banning doesn't happen.

Last point, in reference to the NYT (I think) reference to authors  
including racy words to grab attention: a local author spoke at my  
school today. She has published a YA book (her first) that she  
originally wrote intending it for an adult audience. The original  
book included some "salty characters" (the author's words) whose  
dialogue she changed when she decided to target a younger audience. I  
asked her about the nature of the changes and brought up the present  
Newbery situation. She said she and her editor had lengthy  
discussions and even looked at the book line by line examining it for  
appropriate language. I found that a little scary - another form of  
censorship perhaps?

Cathy
-----------
Cathy Rettberg, MLIS
Head Librarian, Menlo School, grades 6-12
Atherton, CA
crettberg@menloschool.org


On Feb 26, 2007, at 6:45 PM, Carol Bandre wrote:

> I am in a high school library and like to think that deciding what  
> books to purchase is selection.  We belong to a library consortia  
> of 60 libraries, and we teach students to order their own books  
> through the online catalog.  I consider it censorship if I don't  
> allow them to get certain books through other libraries.
>
> Carol Bandre
> Mater Dei High School
> Breese, IL 62230
> cebandre@charter.net
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law.
>   You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings
>   by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book.
> To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu
> In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET  2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL
> 3) SET LM_NET MAIL  4) SET LM_NET DIGEST  * Allow for confirmation.
>  * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/
>  * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/
>  * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/
>  * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------
Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law.
  You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings
  by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book.
To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu
In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET  2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL
3) SET LM_NET MAIL  4) SET LM_NET DIGEST  * Allow for confirmation.
 * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/
 * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/
 * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/
 * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------

LM_NET Mailing List Home