Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
> >Has anyone ever seen a fake security system used? If so, did it help >any? Since the archives are available to anyone, you might want to >reply directly to me. I'll post a summary on Friday, of the format >"X schools have fake security systems, and they report no change in >losses, Y schools have fake security systems, and they report a >decrease in losses." I won't even put in any state information. I >will include any pertinent comments, but again, nothing that would >give anything away. Kids "tested" our system all the time...one of two ways. Either trying to smuggle out a book on their own, or (more often) putting a book in someone else's backpack or purse to embarrass that person. The alarm always went off, often to the great glee of the perp. I always politely took the person aside, and had them empty out their bag/purse. We reset the gate and let others out. We didn't mind all that much since this demonstrated that there really WAS a security system in operation. The deterant value was worth it. Imagine if students 'tested' the system and *nothing* happened because it was a fake system. Word would spread VERY fast, and books would start to disappear, since the students all realized with the large numbers of students that used the library, there would be no way we could manually search every book bag and purse upon exit. I should add that we did not check out books to anyone with overdue items. Most often, it was those people who tried to lift books to use for reports and such. They were welcome to use the material in the library but not check out, so they tried to smuggle them out. One downside of a security system: some of our students obviously came from a school where materials were protected with the Checkpoint system. There, the 'target' is usually concealed behind the date due pocket, so these students would tear out one or more pages in the front of the book, hoping to foil the system. It didn't, of course since the 3M system doesn't use those targets. Others apparently thought that the bar code was the target and would tear them out. *That* caused a lot of problems for us, since many items had escaped having the bar code number written in the book somewhere when processed. Mark Williams Consulting Librarian Professional Services for Conferences, Districts, Workshops markwilliams@makaw.net -------------------------------------------------------------------------- "The closest thing you will find to an orderly universe is a good library" Ashleigh Brilliant -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------