Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I'm not going to try to get in the middle of this, because I'm not really sure what "side" I'm on with this issue. I do find the Dewey system to be tedious at times (especially when I have to catalogue a bunch of complicated books, like game show questions about history, etc.), so there are definitely times when I would love to just say, "Put this in the History section" or "Put this in the Recreation section." But, there are also times when I am very glad to know exactly where to look for a book (796.5 should be between 796.4 and 796.6), especially when a child is looking for one. I can definitely see why people want to make their libraries more consumer friendly, but the needs, and wants, of consumers can vary depending on your personal library environment and purpose. I can not see say, the Army library, making big picture signs saying "Religion Here" or "Sports Here." :-) In the end, I think that the reason we have the Dewey system in the first place is to have a unified method of finding and sorting books for our patrons to use. This way if you live in New York but are in a library in California, or even Italy, you would still know how to look for a book and where to go to find it. If the libraries just had subject areas, as in book stores, the personal decision of where to store the book could vary from library to library. In the end, I think we just want to have something that our patrons can identify with, no matter where they go. If this means that we want to update one of the most universal library systems, then that could be something worth looking into. It really doesn't matter to me what type of system we call it, or what signs we use (DDS 796's or "Sports"), as long as I know exactly where to find books when I need them, and my patrons can have a system to look them up in also. Angelique C. Wylie angwylie@spsk12.net Library Media Specialist John Yeates Middle School, Suffolk, VA -----Original Message----- From: School Library Media & Network Communications [mailto:LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of Anne Oelke Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:54 AM To: LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU Subject: Re: Dewey Decimal System eliminated in new Arizona library. So now all of the books will have to have a shelving location put into the record such as History--US--Civil War. Then this will need to be on the book somewhere so that it can be reshelved in its proper spot (more or less). Then there will need to be a map of the facility indicating where every section is located (why don't bookstores have maps at the door???). And of course all of this will need to be in some electronic database so the customer (patron) can find it. Huh, I think I just described DDC or LC and an OPAC. Oh, and all of those titles that fit more than one category will need multiple access points in the database (can we say subject headings or cross-references??). I think that I can make better use of my time and resources by serving my patrons and not reinventing the wheel. Ok, eyerolls and sarcasm over (mostly)--what can each of us learn from this? 1. Emphasize to all of our patrons/students/customers that DDC or LC are subject classification systems. The number is just a code to help us find the spot a book is located. 2. Good signage and labeling of sections /shelves is helpful to our patrons/students/customers. 3. Providing a comfortable and welcoming atmosphere makes our facilities more attractive to the end user. What other lessons to any of you see in this? Barbara Allen wrote: > > This may be of interest: > _http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0530nodewey0530 .html_ > (http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0530nodewey0530 .html) > OMG > -- Anne Oelke Library Media Specialist pK-12 Cambria-Friesland School District Cambria, WI mailto:cflibrary@cf.k12.wi.us -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------