Previous by DateNext by Date Date Index
Previous by ThreadNext by Thread Thread Index
LM_NET Archive



I have been watching this topic with interest for some time now.  I am a big Dewey 
supporter but not because I believe that Dewey is the end all be all.  I just hate 
reinventing the wheel.  After over 30 years of work as a school library media 
specialist I know how long it can take to make the most minor changes in 
cataloging.  My high school library has been working for over 5 years to change 
from Cutter author numbers to three author letter designations.  We are not close 
to finished and the time spent making such changes takes time away from students.

I am not sure, however, that there is a real problem.  Dewey numbers can be a 
mystery to patrons but there is really no need for them to be.  Dewey numbers 
organize materials by topic. We just need to provide signage that puts that 
information into English.  Patrons wishing to browse by topic should be able to 
find it by Dewey using the catalog or by topic within the stacks by following the 
signage posted.  398  or a sign designating "Folklore and Fairytales" should guide 
the patron to the same place. No big deal.

For some reason there seems to be some resistance to using signage to help patrons 
in some libraries.  Part of that may simply be that librarians are comfortable with 
the Dewey system and just forget that Dewey numbers are not always user friendly.   
Another problem is space.  Libraries have stacks, not because it is the ideal way 
to display books but because they allow the storage of many more items within a 
limited area.  My grade school library is currently forced to store as many as 
75-85 items on nearly every shelf. (Thank heaven elementary books are thin!)  There 
is no place for displays within our stacks and very little anywhere else.  Even 
finding places for signage is a problem.  If I had unlimited space I would spread 
the collection out, use shelves to display signage and display more books front 
cover out to attract browsers to their favorite subjects.  I would continue to use 
the Dewey Decimal System to organize the collection, however.  It works. 

May be we should talk about an Enhance Dewey Decimal System...libraries organized 
by Dewey with extensive signage by topics in the stacks.  Wow what a brave NEW 
concept!  ;^)

Paula Bainter
Ellsworth High School/Grade School
Ellsworth, Kansas

Want good things to happen?
Do good things.

"We are confronted with insurmountable opportunities."  
-Pogo  


_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law.
  You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings
  by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book.
To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu
In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET  2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL
3) SET LM_NET MAIL  4) SET LM_NET DIGEST  * Allow for confirmation.
 * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/
 * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/
 * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/
 * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------

LM_NET Mailing List Home