Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
John's spam-restrictor was still on when I responded so I'm posting this to the group. His original message follows my response. John, I faced the same dilemma. I was given a list of all the HM titles. I too was alarmed at the older copyright dates. What you will find however, is that many are out of print. Of those that aren't, be sure to check the reviews (Follett's Titlewave is a great resource for comparing several reviews at a time); just because a book (or I should say, perhaps a chapter or two, in the case of upper grade fiction) is selected for a textbook anthology doesn't mean it was of the highest quality literature. It most likely fit the theme and the reading level. I found that often the books were not highly rated (especially the chapter books - they were generally rated good to mediocre) so I'm guessing/hoping that the textbook anthology used the best chapter(s)! I ended up not ordering many of them - either due to out-of-print status or poor reviews. I would rather have other titles that support the curriculum that are more current and better quality - took a lot of work on my part but I did find better selections. Hope that perspective helps! Joanne Ladewig (A.K.A. "Library Lady") Library Media Tech Lawrence Elementary, GGUSD Garden Grove, California shatz@verizon.net Comments are my own and may not represent the views of GGUSD John posted: I need some advice regarding book purchases that I am considering. My teachers (K-5) will have a new reading adoption this year which will be core reading curriculum for the next 6 years (Houghton Mifflin). HM supplies a bibliography of picture books that relate to the units to be taught and I am thrilled that my staff not only wants me to add these books to our collection, but I am confident they will use them. However, many of the books have an older copyright date than most of the books I would normally consider for purchase. I think it will set my collection age back a bit, but I am OK about that if the books are utilized. (I won $500 to spend as I wish, so that's a bonus-I'm not using my regular budget). My question is this: is this addition to my collection good practice? I have noticed in most bibliographies that accompany texts, handbooks, etc. that they often refer to older books to help supplement the teaching. I think that the editors/contributors can't keep up with the current market and often rely on "time tested" oldies. I'm not wanting to buy older books, but....if they serve a specific purpose in supporting the curriculum, then I feel like I ought to do it. Any comments are appreciated. John Wolfgang, LMS Gilbert Heights School (K-5) David Douglas School District Portland, Oregon wolfgang@teleport.com -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------