Previous by DateNext by Date Date Index
Previous by ThreadNext by Thread Thread Index
LM_NET Archive



I saw the show and remarked to my husband and son that this was a horrible 
question. The answer was correct--It is false that fiction books are NOT 
assigned a Dewey number, but the double negative is confusing to say the 
least. This show was already getting a thumbs down from me and this question 
cemented my poor opinion of it. I don't really buy that some of these 
questions are actually for the age the show says. They had a geometry 
question on Tuesday that was supposed to be fourth grade math. I never had 
to calculate the height of a triangle in the fourth grade. And the questions 
that are appropriate for the grade level are embarrassing when the 
contestants get them wrong. It seems like they are screening for dumb 
contestants. It also seems like the kids are coached. All-in-all, a bad 
show.

That being said, I would like to get your opinions on one thing: I told my 
son and husband that most elementary kids would be totally confused by the 
Dewey question because, while there is a literature Dewey designation, most 
school libraries have fiction in a separate section. Am I wrong?



Marsha Redd
Librarian, Kelloggsville High School
Grand Rapids, MI
marsharedd@hotmail.com
Education is not a goal; it is a life-long process. Everyone is a student. 
Everyone is a teacher.



----Original Message Follows----
From: Leigh Woznick <bookmom@OPTONLINE.NET>
Reply-To: Leigh Woznick <bookmom@OPTONLINE.NET>
To: LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Subject: [LM_NET] GEN: game show mistake?
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 01:24:58 -0500

Did anyone else see the new game show "Are you smarter than a 5th grader" 
tonight?
One of the questions was in the category of 3rd grade reading.  I didn't see 
the whole show, and came in on this question.  But I think it said:

"True or false?  Fiction books are NOT assigned numbers in the Dewey Decimal 
System".

The woman contestant and all of the 5th graders answered false, and they 
were told
this was correct.

Am I crazy?  Did I see it wrong? I think everyone got tripped up by 
semantics -- it was confusingly worded.
But if I saw it correctly, this is perpetuating incorrect information to 
however many millions of folks watched the show.


Leigh Woznick
Library Media Specialist
Bridgewater-Raritan Middle School
Bridgewater, NJ
lwoznick@brrsd.k12.nj.us


--------------------------------------------------------------------
Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law.
   You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings
   by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book.
To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu
In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET  2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL
3) SET LM_NET MAIL  4) SET LM_NET DIGEST  * Allow for confirmation.
  * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/
  * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/
  * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/
  * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law.
  You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings
  by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book.
To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu
In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET  2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL
3) SET LM_NET MAIL  4) SET LM_NET DIGEST  * Allow for confirmation.
 * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/
 * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/
 * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/
 * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------

LM_NET Mailing List Home