Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Hi All, Ironically, we seem to shun Wikipedia, an early 2.0 source, for the very same reason we use blogs or wikis: their open-ended, collaborative; hence, unreliable nature. I agree with Shonda that we should be cautious with Wikipedia when teaching research tools, but should we choose not to teach it or only as a last resort? I think we should instead highlight how to use it. Isn't it an IP goal to help students become independent and critical users of information? They will face misinformation in various forms their entire lives; shouldn't we nurture a critical ability to check facts when warranted no matter what the source? Gee, I remember not so long ago teaching 6th graders that the World Wide Web itself could be unreliable. I've seen misinformation printed in reference books. What does the Academic Librarian who wrote Ann over Wikipedia use have to say about the renowned physicist, Alan Sokal, who intentionally wrote a hoax article published by a refereed journal, to highlight the shortcomings of academia? http://hps.elte.hu/~gk/Sokal/Sokal/boghossian_tls.html Besides students will use Wikipedia anyway! I think the key is to look at teacher expectations and student behavior; we need to change the former before the student use of Wikipedia will abate. Shonda says: "...showing students the BEST resources to use first (print, online databases, library resources, primary sources) and then showing them how bad information is easily located online by anyone with an Internet account." In my experience, this is overly optimistic; students model their teacher's expectations and behavior first, so if their teacher accepts Wikipedia, let the "research" begin! Why not meet students where they are? Teach Wikipedia, but in the way Shonda describes; as a possibly unreliable source that requires further fact-checking. Or, better yet, make a collaborative project out of it. Students can use more traditional, "reliable" sources to research a topic and create or add content to a Wikipedia article citing all their research. We should focus on the source only as a means to teach critical thinking. Just some thoughts in progress, Laura Laura Brooks Library Media Teacher Amerman Elementary School Northville, MI brooksla@northville.k12.mi.us "Unless someone like you cares a whole lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not." -The Lorax, Dr. Seuss -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------