Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
While I also found Sharon's post very thought provoking, for me it serves as insight into an opposing viewpoint. I'm very excited about the new standards and looking forward to sharing them with faculty and adminstration over the next semester. For me, the standards seem visionary, not vague. After all, the future of learning (technology, knowledge, skills, etc) is constantly changing, and specific standards can quickly become antiquated. Specific standards need to be devised at the building or district leven and reviewed and revised frequently. Listening to education/tech gurus like David Warlick or Ian Jukes and witnessing what happens every day with my students has convinced me that education needs to/will change, and I think the new standards are the start (just the start) of a new road map for school libraries. Am I doing everything suggested by the standards? No, but I can envision it, and I'm seeing glimmers of it throughout our school. I think the new standards expand information literacy beyond the school library in a positive new way. And if I do my job well, I'll be an integral part of the future of learning for our students. I think the new standards fit well with what educators/adminstrators are hearing and seeing in their own professional development, and they can become a basis for discussion of the evolving role of the school librarian. Who knew school librarians were such visionaries? (Alright, we did, but now let's show them!) As for the old standards vs the new, why does it have to be either/or? I recognize the continued value of Information Power, which, I will admit has much more "practical" (less visionary) standards. I'll still teach these standards/skills, but the vison of the new standards will inspire me to teach them always in new ways. I think the power of the new standards is that they ask us to move beyond the traditional roles we have played, and the traditional skills we have taught. What is the new definition of information literacy? Who knows, yet? It's ever changing in today's world, and the point is that we need to teach our students to continue to be information literate, even as what that means changes. I'm teaching a class on Information Literacy for school library certification candidates at our university this semester, and I've organized the syllabus by the new standards - 16 weeks allows for a week or two of introduction, then we'll study a common belief or standard each week. I'm excited about delving into the standards with my students and hearing the discussion (good and bad) they will provoke. I'm sure some of my students will feel as Sharon and many others do, that the standards are not what they'd hoped for the profession. However, as a group, I'm hoping we can flesh out what the new standards mean for each of us, and for our schools and students. I'm hoping we can identify some agreed upon skills, targets, benchmarks, etc. that will be relevant to us in this time and place. I'm hoping the new standards will inspire each of my students to write her own future as a school librarian, and help her see all the possibilities in the future of our profession. Anita Beaman ________________________________ From: School Library Media & Network Communications on behalf of Jacqueline Henry Sent: Thu 1/3/2008 8:32 AM To: LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU Subject: Re: Reflection on AASL's new standards I must say that Sharon's post has really made me think & has helped me to understand why I feel so uncomfortable with the new standards. I expected to LOVE them, because of their emphasis on twenty-first century learning. Instead - they feel very "slippery" to me. I have assumed the problem was because I have not yet studied them as thoroughly as I should - but perhaps there really IS little to grab onto. Of course I plan to study the standards more carefully. But what if I decide that I prefer the "old" standards? Do I continue using the standards which have been serving my program so well? Or am I somehow obligated to use the new standards? I tend to be an early adapter - so I feel really out of my comfort zone with this whole issue. I hope this post will generate a lot of discussion. I particularly look forward to hearing from people who really like the new standards and have ideas about how to translate them into practical teaching techniques and curriculum frameworks. Jacquie "The Librarian, whose job is to heal ignorance, to keep life safe for poetry and to put knowledge smack dab in the middle of the American way." From The Philadelphia Inquirer, 9-20-03 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jacquie Henry, MLS Ruben A. Cirillo High School (GHS) Gananda Central School District 3195 Wiedrick Road P.O. Box 609 Macedon, NY 14502 315-986-3521 x 3144 jhenry@gananda.org Library Page: http://www.gananda.org/library/mshslibrary/indexgcl.htm Blog: http://nlcommunities.com/communities/wanderings/default.aspx -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------