Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I appreciate hearing everyone's comments on the new standards. I've been struggling with them at the school level. Here's what I'm juggling: 1) New state standards for Georgia (Georgia Performance Standards) 2) New AASL standards 3) New ISTE standards 4) A state information-literacy check-list (that has been waiting for AASL's and ISTE's updates for revision) And accountability for these standards? (We all know this is what focuses the funding.) 1) State Standards: CRCT - only 2-3 questions concerning research on the ELA test section. Most of the questions in the past have been almost impossible to teach to. Teachers don't feel the pressure to emphasize research. 2) AASL standards: We should see results through state testing? How do we articulate that media specialists are truly impacting the data? Although we are sure of the positive impact of the media programs, we can still only see in broad generalizations. 3) ISTE tech standards: NCLB Title II, Part D Enhancing Education Through Technology section has now told us that all kids should be technology literate by the 8th grade. GA translated this by requiring all systems to document proficiency and has provided a free test inventory based on the ISTE standards. Well done! Next step: how does each district use the results for positive, progressive change? 4) State information literacy checklists (if available): possible accountability through state tests only (unless you create informal school or system level assessments) Perhaps this is impossible, but I'd love to ensure that all my students, 6th-8th grade, learn a set group of skills each year. I'd love it to be process-oriented, and I would like it to build incrementally over time. I'd also like to know that if a student left/entered my school, they would not lose/need to gain these skills. I'd also like to see the high school media specialists (and beyond) know what my students have learned and hold them accountable for it. The AASL standards are an overview of best practices. What will they mean K-12? How do we make sure the rigor and the quality is there? More importantly, how do we convince our faculty, admin, and politicians that we are driving these standards and pushing American education to a higher level? Whew, Lindy Pals, Library Media Specialist Jefferson Middle School Jefferson GA lpals@jeffcityschools.org -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------